Follow US:

Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Are the Iowa Caucuses a fair way to start primary season?

Normal
(0)
Difficulty: 0

DOESN'T

DOESN'T MATCH

DOESN'T MATCH UP

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE REST

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE REST OF

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE REST OF THE

DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH THE REST OF THE COUNTRY.

OF THE COUNTRY.

OF THE COUNTRY. >>

OF THE COUNTRY. >> Reporter:

OF THE COUNTRY. >> Reporter: SINCE

OF THE COUNTRY. >> Reporter: SINCE 1972,

OF THE COUNTRY. >> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS BEEN

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS BEEN THE

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS BEEN THE FIRST

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE

>> Reporter: SINCE 1972, IOWA HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE FOR

HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE FOR

HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE FOR PRESIDENTIAL

HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES,

HAS BEEN THE FIRST DATE FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A TRADITION

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A TRADITION THAT

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A TRADITION THAT HAS

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT

PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES, A TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF ATTENTION

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF ATTENTION TO

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE

TRADITION THAT HAS BROUGHT A LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL

LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL

LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL MIDWESTERN

LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL MIDWESTERN STATE,

LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT

LOT OF ATTENTION TO THE RURAL MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT IS

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT IS TIME

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A

MIDWESTERN STATE, BUT SOME ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE.

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >>

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >> IT

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >> IT HAS

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >> IT HAS BROUGHT

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >> IT HAS BROUGHT UP

ARGUE IT IS TIME FOR A CHANGE. >> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE

>> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE

>> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE CONVERSATION

>> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE CONVERSATION OF

>> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE CONVERSATION OF JUST

>> IT HAS BROUGHT UP THE CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW

CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW

CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW UNREPRESENTATIVE

CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA

CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS

CONVERSATION OF JUST HOW UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE THE

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE THE QUESTION

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE THE QUESTION OF

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY

UNREPRESENTATIVE IOWA IS AND RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA ALWAYS

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA ALWAYS GET

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA ALWAYS GET TO

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO

RAISE THE QUESTION OF WHY DOES IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST?

IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST?

IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST? >>

IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST? >> Reporter:

IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST? >> Reporter: CATHERINE

IOWA ALWAYS GET TO GO FIRST? >> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS IT

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS IT IS

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS IT IS A

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS IT IS A VALID

>> Reporter: CATHERINE PEARSON SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT,

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT,

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT, ACCORDING

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT, ACCORDING TO

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT, ACCORDING TO THE

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT, ACCORDING TO THE LATEST

SAYS IT IS A VALID ARGUMENT, ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS,

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS,

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, IOWA

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, IOWA RANKS

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, IOWA RANKS 31st

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, IOWA RANKS 31st IN

ACCORDING TO THE LATEST CENSUS, IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION,

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION,

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS 91

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS 91 PERCENT

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS 91 PERCENT WHITE

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED

IOWA RANKS 31st IN POPULATION, IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO 76

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO 76 PERCENT

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO 76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO 76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND

IS 91 PERCENT WHITE COMPARED TO 76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE IS

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE IS MOSTLY

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO

76 PERCENT NATIONWIDE AND THE STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS COMING

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS COMING OUT

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS COMING OUT OF

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA

STATE IS MOSTLY RURAL SO THE RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS ARE

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS ARE NOT

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A

RESULTS COMING OUT OF IOWA SHE SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION OF

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION OF THE

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION OF THE REST

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION OF THE REST OF

SAYS ARE NOT EXACTLY A PERFECT REFLECTION OF THE REST OF THE

REFLECTION OF THE REST OF THE

REFLECTION OF THE REST OF THE COUNTRY.

COUNTRY.

COUNTRY. >>

COUNTRY. >> THERE'S

COUNTRY. >> THERE'S LONG

COUNTRY. >> THERE'S LONG BEEN

COUNTRY. >> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM THAT

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM THAT IT

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM THAT IT SHOULD

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE,

>> THERE'S LONG BEEN CRITICISM THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT SHOULDN'T

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT SHOULDN'T ALWAYS

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN

THAT IT SHOULD ROTATE, IT SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA.

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA.

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA. >>

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA. >> Reporter:

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA. >> Reporter: BESIDES

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA. >> Reporter: BESIDES THE

SHOULDN'T ALWAYS BE IN IOWA. >> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE ITSELF

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE ITSELF BUT

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE ITSELF BUT THERE

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE ITSELF BUT THERE WAS

>> Reporter: BESIDES THE STATE ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO CRITICISM

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO CRITICISM ABOUT

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO CRITICISM ABOUT THE

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY

ITSELF BUT THERE WAS ALSO CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE STATE

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE STATE USES

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE STATE USES CAUCUSES

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE STATE USES CAUCUSES INSTEAD

CRITICISM ABOUT THE WAY THE STATE USES CAUCUSES INSTEAD OF

STATE USES CAUCUSES INSTEAD OF

STATE USES CAUCUSES INSTEAD OF PRIMARIES.

PRIMARIES.

PRIMARIES. PEARSON

PRIMARIES. PEARSON SAYS

PRIMARIES. PEARSON SAYS WITH

PRIMARIES. PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE CAN

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE CAN VOTE

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A

PEARSON SAYS WITH PRIMARIES PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT ANY

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT ANY TIME

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY

PEOPLE CAN VOTE IN A FEW MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT

MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT

MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT WITH

MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT WITH CAUCUSES

MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT WITH CAUCUSES THERE

MINUTES AT ANY TIME OF DAY BUT WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD AT

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD AT NIGHT

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD AT NIGHT AND

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE

WITH CAUCUSES THERE USUALLY HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE TO

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE TO COMMIT

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE TO COMMIT SEVERAL

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE TO COMMIT SEVERAL HOURS

HELD AT NIGHT AND PEOPLE HAVE TO COMMIT SEVERAL HOURS OF

TO COMMIT SEVERAL HOURS OF

TO COMMIT SEVERAL HOURS OF THEIR

TO COMMIT SEVERAL HOURS OF THEIR TIME.

THEIR TIME.

THEIR TIME. >>

THEIR TIME. >> CAUCUSES

THEIR TIME. >> CAUCUSES ARE

THEIR TIME. >> CAUCUSES ARE A

THEIR TIME. >> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG

THEIR TIME. >> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM PEOPLE

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM PEOPLE WHO

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE

>> CAUCUSES ARE A BIG BURDEN FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS,

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS, WHO

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS, WHO ARE

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME

FROM PEOPLE WHO MAY HAVE TWO JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO JUST

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO JUST DON'T

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO JUST DON'T WANT

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO

JOBS, WHO ARE LOWER INCOME OR WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS

WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS

WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS

WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS WITH

WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS WITH THEIR

WHO JUST DON'T WANT TO DISCUSS POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR.

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR.

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR. >>

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR. >> Reporter:

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR. >> Reporter: RESIDES

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR. >> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA,

POLITICS WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR. >> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE ONLY

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE ONLY OTHER

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE ONLY OTHER STATES

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE ONLY OTHER STATES THAT

>> Reporter: RESIDES IOWA, THE ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD CAUCUSES

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD CAUCUSES ARE

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND

ONLY OTHER STATES THAT HOLD CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING ON

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING ON THE

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING ON THE DEMOCRAT

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE

CAUCUSES ARE NEVADA AND WYOMING ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS ALSO

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN

ON THE DEMOCRAT SIDE AND REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN A

REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN A

REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN A FEW

REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN A FEW U.S.

REPUBLICANS ALSO HOST THEM IN A FEW U.S. TERRITORIES.

FEW U.S. TERRITORIES.

FEW U.S. TERRITORIES. SOME

FEW U.S. TERRITORIES. SOME BENEFITS

FEW U.S. TERRITORIES. SOME BENEFITS OF

FEW U.S. TERRITORIES. SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES VOTERS

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES VOTERS MORE

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO

SOME BENEFITS OF CAUCUSING GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE CANDIDATES

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE CANDIDATES AND

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE CANDIDATES AND GIVES

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES

GIVES VOTERS MORE ACCESS TO THE CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE TO

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE TO RALLY

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE

CANDIDATES AND GIVES PARTIES A CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH ALL

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH ALL THE

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH ALL THE ISSUES

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE

CHANCE TO RALLY THEIR BASE BUT WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE

WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE

WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE MENTIONED

WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE MENTIONED THAT

WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE MENTIONED THAT THE

WITH ALL THE ISSUES WE HAVE MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS MONDAY

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS MONDAY NIGHT,

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS

MENTIONED THAT THE PROBLEMS MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS TIME

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS TIME HONORED

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS TIME HONORED TRADITION

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY

MONDAY NIGHT, PEARSON SAYS THIS TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON

TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON

TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON COME

TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON COME TO

TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON COME TO AN

TIME HONORED TRADITION MAY SOON COME TO AN END.

COME TO AN END.

COME TO AN END. >>

COME TO AN END. >> REFORMERS

COME TO AN END. >> REFORMERS NEED

COME TO AN END. >> REFORMERS NEED TO

COME TO AN END. >> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK

COME TO AN END. >> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD ABOUT

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD ABOUT WHETHER

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD ABOUT WHETHER A

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD ABOUT WHETHER A NEW

>> REFORMERS NEED TO THINK HARD ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING

ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING

ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING CONTEST

ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING CONTEST WOULD

ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE

ABOUT WHETHER A NEW NOMINATING CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER RSULTS

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER RSULTS FOR

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER RSULTS FOR THE

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES

CONTEST WOULD PRODUCE BETTER RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND

RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND

RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND WOULD

RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND WOULD BE

RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND WOULD BE MORE

RSULTS FOR THE PARTIES AND WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE.

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE.

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE. >>

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE. >> Reporter:

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE. >> Reporter: SOME

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE. >> Reporter: SOME ARE

WOULD BE MORE REPRESENTATIVE. >> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING IOWA

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING IOWA AND

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING IOWA AND THE

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING IOWA AND THE CAUCUS

>> Reporter: SOME ARE DEFENDING IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM

IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM

IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM SAYING

IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM SAYING THAT

IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM SAYING THAT THIS

IOWA AND THE CAUCUS SYSTEM SAYING THAT THIS TECHNICAL

SAYING THAT THIS TECHNICAL

SAYING THAT THIS TECHNICAL ISSUE

SAYING THAT THIS TECHNICAL ISSUE SHOULD

The Description of Are the Iowa Caucuses a fair way to start primary season?