Practice English Speaking&Listening with: What Could 'Soon' Mean For The House Speaker? | Morning Joe | MSNBC

Normal
(0)
Difficulty: 0

9/11. AT EVERY POINT CONGRESS JUST

AT EVERY POINT CONGRESS JUST SAYS, YEAH, DO WHATEVER YOU WANT

SAYS, YEAH, DO WHATEVER YOU WANT TO DO BASICALLY.

TO DO BASICALLY. >> SO, JAKE SHERMAN, NANCY

>> SO, JAKE SHERMAN, NANCY PELOSI WHILE SHES BEEN

PELOSI WHILE SHES BEEN DEFENDING THE WAR POWERS

DEFENDING THE WAR POWERS RESOLUTION HAS HAD TO DEFEND HER

RESOLUTION HAS HAD TO DEFEND HER HANDLE OF IMPEACHMENT.

HANDLE OF IMPEACHMENT. SHES GETTING SOME PRESSURE FROM

SHES GETTING SOME PRESSURE FROM DEMOCRATS.

DEMOCRATS. NOW LOOKS LIKE SHES INCHING

NOW LOOKS LIKE SHES INCHING CLOSER TO SENDING THOSE ARTICLES

CLOSER TO SENDING THOSE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT

OF IMPEACHMENT AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP FINALLY OVER TO THE SENATE

TRUMP FINALLY OVER TO THE SENATE BUT ON HER TIMELINE.

BUT ON HER TIMELINE. HERES WHAT SHE SAID.

HERES WHAT SHE SAID. >> NOW, IN TERMS OF IMPEACHMENT,

>> NOW, IN TERMS OF IMPEACHMENT, YOU ALL KEEP ASKING ME THE SAME

YOU ALL KEEP ASKING ME THE SAME QUESTION AND KEEP GIVING YOU THE

QUESTION AND KEEP GIVING YOU THE SAME ANSWER.

SAME ANSWER. AS I SAID RIGHT FROM THE START,

AS I SAID RIGHT FROM THE START, WE NEED TO SEE THAT THE ARENA IN

WE NEED TO SEE THAT THE ARENA IN WHICH WE ARE SENDING OUR

WHICH WE ARE SENDING OUR MANAGERS.

MANAGERS. IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK?

IS THAT TOO MUCH TO ASK? >> ARE YOU HOLDING THEM

>> ARE YOU HOLDING THEM INDEFINITELY?

INDEFINITELY? >> NO, IM NOT HOLDING THEM

>> NO, IM NOT HOLDING THEM INDEFINITELY.

INDEFINITELY. ILL SEND THEM OVER WHEN IM

ILL SEND THEM OVER WHEN IM READY.

READY. AND THAT WILL PROBABLY BE SOON.

AND THAT WILL PROBABLY BE SOON. >> SO, JAKE, ON THE OTHER SIDE

>> SO, JAKE, ON THE OTHER SIDE YOU HAVE LEADER McCONNELL WHO

YOU HAVE LEADER McCONNELL WHO SAID IM NOT GOING TO SHOW YOU

SAID IM NOT GOING TO SHOW YOU THE ARENA, I DONT OWE YOU THAT

THE ARENA, I DONT OWE YOU THAT EXPLANATION.

EXPLANATION. SEND THEM OVER, WELL HAVE A

SEND THEM OVER, WELL HAVE A TRIAL.

TRIAL. HES SAID HES NOT AN IMPARTIAL

HES SAID HES NOT AN IMPARTIAL JUROR, THAT HES COORDINATING

JUROR, THAT HES COORDINATING WITH THE WHITE HOUSE.

WITH THE WHITE HOUSE. SO WHEN WILL SHE BE SATISFIED

SO WHEN WILL SHE BE SATISFIED WITH WHAT SHE SEES OVER IN THE

WITH WHAT SHE SEES OVER IN THE SENATE ENOUGH TO SEND OVER THE

SENATE ENOUGH TO SEND OVER THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT?

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT? >> WELL, THATS A GOOD QUESTION

>> WELL, THATS A GOOD QUESTION BECAUSE SHES NOT GOING TO SEE

BECAUSE SHES NOT GOING TO SEE ANYTHING IN THE SENATE.

ANYTHING IN THE SENATE. THATS THE QUESTION THAT YOU

THATS THE QUESTION THAT YOU MIGHT WANT TO POSE TO HER

MIGHT WANT TO POSE TO HER BECAUSE MITCH McCONNELL HAS SAID

BECAUSE MITCH McCONNELL HAS SAID FLATLY, IM NOT GOING TO SHOW

FLATLY, IM NOT GOING TO SHOW YOU THE RULES.

YOU THE RULES. ITS GOING TO BE CLOSE TO THE

ITS GOING TO BE CLOSE TO THE CLINTON RULES WHICH ARE

CLINTON RULES WHICH ARE OBVIOUSLY ALREADY OUT AND

OBVIOUSLY ALREADY OUT AND SEARCHABLE ONLINE.

SEARCHABLE ONLINE. SO, LISTEN, NANCY PELOSIS

SO, LISTEN, NANCY PELOSIS DETRACTORS ARGUE THAT SHE HAS

DETRACTORS ARGUE THAT SHE HAS WASTED TWO WEEKS, THREE WEEKS

WASTED TWO WEEKS, THREE WEEKS AND SHE COULD HAVE SENT THIS

AND SHE COULD HAVE SENT THIS OVER A COUPLE WEEKS AGO OR THIS

OVER A COUPLE WEEKS AGO OR THIS WEEK TO GET THIS TRIAL STARTED.

WEEK TO GET THIS TRIAL STARTED. AND SHES ALREADY IMPEACHED THE

AND SHES ALREADY IMPEACHED THE PRESIDENT, SHE MIGHT AS WELL

PRESIDENT, SHE MIGHT AS WELL SEND THE ARTICLES TO THE SENATE.

SEND THE ARTICLES TO THE SENATE. HER ALLIES AND HER AIDES SAID

HER ALLIES AND HER AIDES SAID THAT SHES FORCED A WEEKS LONG

THAT SHES FORCED A WEEKS LONG DISCUSSION ON WHETHER THE SENATE

DISCUSSION ON WHETHER THE SENATE IS HOW HAVE WITNESSES BAKED INTO

IS HOW HAVE WITNESSES BAKED INTO THE PROCESS.

THE PROCESS. OF COURSE WITNESSES MIGHT OR

OF COURSE WITNESSES MIGHT OR MIGHT NOT BE PART OF THE

MIGHT NOT BE PART OF THE PROCESS, THEYLL BE SUBJECT TO A

PROCESS, THEYLL BE SUBJECT TO A MAJORITY VOTE IN THE SENATE

MAJORITY VOTE IN THE SENATE DURING THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL.

DURING THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL. THIS MIGHT MAKE PEOPLES EYES

THIS MIGHT MAKE PEOPLES EYES GLAZE OVER, BUT THATS THE

GLAZE OVER, BUT THATS THE REALITY.

REALITY. AND, LISTEN, NANCY PELOSI HAS --

AND, LISTEN, NANCY PELOSI HAS -- IS GOING TO SEND THESE OVER.

IS GOING TO SEND THESE OVER. SHES NOT GOING TO SEE THE RULES

SHES NOT GOING TO SEE THE RULES FOR THE TRIAL.

FOR THE TRIAL. SO ITS FAIR TO ASK WHAT EXACTLY

SO ITS FAIR TO ASK WHAT EXACTLY SHES ACCOMPLISHED.

SHES ACCOMPLISHED. BUT PEOPLE IN HER ORBIT BELIEVE

BUT PEOPLE IN HER ORBIT BELIEVE THAT SHE HAS AT LEAST NOTCHED A

THAT SHE HAS AT LEAST NOTCHED A POLITICAL VICTORY BY FORCING

POLITICAL VICTORY BY FORCING THIS WEEKS LONG DISCUSSION.

THIS WEEKS LONG DISCUSSION. THERE WILL BE A LOT OF

THERE WILL BE A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT.

DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. BUT I IMAGINE BASED ON WHAT SHE

BUT I IMAGINE BASED ON WHAT SHE SAID YESTERDAY, THE CLIP YOU

SAID YESTERDAY, THE CLIP YOU JUST SHOWED, SHE IS GOING TO

JUST SHOWED, SHE IS GOING TO SEND THESE ARTICLES, IF NOT

SEND THESE ARTICLES, IF NOT TODAY, I DONT THINK IT WILL BE

TODAY, I DONT THINK IT WILL BE TODAY, BUT MONDAY OR TUESDAY

TODAY, BUT MONDAY OR TUESDAY WHICH WOULD BEGIN THE

WHICH WOULD BEGIN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL NEXT THURSDAY

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL NEXT THURSDAY OR FRIDAY-ISH, DEPENDING ON WHEN

OR FRIDAY-ISH, DEPENDING ON WHEN SHE SENDS THEM, AND THEN THE

SHE SENDS THEM, AND THEN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL WILL GET

IMPEACHMENT TRIAL WILL GET STARTED.

STARTED. SO THATS THE DYNAMIC --

SO THATS THE DYNAMIC -- >> BUT WHAT WILL BE DIFFERENT

>> BUT WHAT WILL BE DIFFERENT THAT DAY, A FEW DAYS FROM NOW

THAT DAY, A FEW DAYS FROM NOW THAN TODAY?

THAN TODAY? >> NOTHING.

>> NOTHING. >> SO THEN WHAT WILL HAVE BEEN

>> SO THEN WHAT WILL HAVE BEEN HER LEVERAGE?

HER LEVERAGE? WHAT WILL SHE HAVE ACHIEVED?

WHAT WILL SHE HAVE ACHIEVED? >> LEVERAGE IS ONLY -- LEVERAGE

>> LEVERAGE IS ONLY -- LEVERAGE SAY DYNAMIC WHICH EACH SIDE

SAY DYNAMIC WHICH EACH SIDE NEEDS SOMETHING FROM THE OTHER

NEEDS SOMETHING FROM THE OTHER SIDE.

SIDE. MITCH McCONNELL DOESNT NEED

MITCH McCONNELL DOESNT NEED ANYTHING FROM NANCY PELOSI, SO

ANYTHING FROM NANCY PELOSI, SO THE LEVERAGE -- I DONT KNOW IF

THE LEVERAGE -- I DONT KNOW IF SHE EVER SAID IT, BUT THE

SHE EVER SAID IT, BUT THE LEVERAGE THAT HER ALLIES BELIEVE

LEVERAGE THAT HER ALLIES BELIEVE SHE HAD SHE NEVER ACTUALLY HAD.

SHE HAD SHE NEVER ACTUALLY HAD. SHE NEVER WAS ABLE TO CHANGE THE

SHE NEVER WAS ABLE TO CHANGE THE RULES.

RULES. MITCH McCONNELL, LIKE HIM OR

MITCH McCONNELL, LIKE HIM OR NOT, HAS A VERY, VERY TIGHT GRIP

NOT, HAS A VERY, VERY TIGHT GRIP ON REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE AND

ON REPUBLICANS IN THE SENATE AND HE CAME OUT TO THE MICROPHONES

HE CAME OUT TO THE MICROPHONES EARLIER THIS WEEK AND SAID I

EARLIER THIS WEEK AND SAID I HAVE MY ENTIRE CONFERENCE, ALL

HAVE MY ENTIRE CONFERENCE, ALL 53 SENATORS BEHIND ME AND IF YOU

53 SENATORS BEHIND ME AND IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO SEND MET ARTICLES,

WOULD LIKE TO SEND MET ARTICLES, GREAT.

GREAT. IF NOT, ILL MOVE ON TO PASSING

IF NOT, ILL MOVE ON TO PASSING A TRADE DEAL AND CONFIRMING MORE

A TRADE DEAL AND CONFIRMING MORE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES.

CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES. MITCH McCONNELL NEVER NEEDED

MITCH McCONNELL NEVER NEEDED ANYTHING FROM NANCY PELOSI SO

ANYTHING FROM NANCY PELOSI SO THERE NEVER WAS ANY LEVERAGE.

THERE NEVER WAS ANY LEVERAGE. IT WAS ALL IMAGINED AND KIND OF

IT WAS ALL IMAGINED AND KIND OF A POLITICAL STUNT, WHICH DIDNT

A POLITICAL STUNT, WHICH DIDNT COST ANYBODY ANYTHING, IT WASNT

COST ANYBODY ANYTHING, IT WASNT DAMAGING, ITS NOT LIKE SHUTTING

DAMAGING, ITS NOT LIKE SHUTTING DOWN THE GOVERNMENT.

DOWN THE GOVERNMENT. IT JUST PUT US IN THIS SUSPENDED

IT JUST PUT US IN THIS SUSPENDED STATE OF PAUSE FOR TWO WEEKS FOR

STATE OF PAUSE FOR TWO WEEKS FOR SEEMINGLY LITTLE PRACTICAL

SEEMINGLY LITTLE PRACTICAL REASON, ALTHOUGH YOU COULD ARGUE

REASON, ALTHOUGH YOU COULD ARGUE THERE WAS A POLITICAL REASON.

THERE WAS A POLITICAL REASON. >> JOE, MITCH McCONNELL WAS

>> JOE, MITCH McCONNELL WAS ASKED LAST NIGHT ABOUT NANCY

ASKED LAST NIGHT ABOUT NANCY PELOSIS DEAND NOMAND TO SEE THE

PELOSIS DEAND NOMAND TO SEE THE FOR THE TRIAL.

FOR THE TRIAL. HE SAID FLATLY, YEAH, WERE NOT

HE SAID FLATLY, YEAH, WERE NOT GOING TO DO THAT AND KEPT

GOING TO DO THAT AND KEPT WALKING.

WALKING. >> YOU KNOW, YOU LOOK AT WHATS

>> YOU KNOW, YOU LOOK AT WHATS HAPPENED SINCE NANCY PELOSIS

HAPPENED SINCE NANCY PELOSIS DELAYED THIS INSTEAD OF RUSHING

DELAYED THIS INSTEAD OF RUSHING IT THROUGH.

IT THROUGH. SUDDENLY JOHN BOLTON, PERHAPS

SUDDENLY JOHN BOLTON, PERHAPS THE MOST IMPORTANT WITNESS TO

THE MOST IMPORTANT WITNESS TO ALL OF THIS SAYS HELL COME

ALL OF THIS SAYS HELL COME FORWARD AND TALK GIVEN THE RIGHT

FORWARD AND TALK GIVEN THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITY.

OPPORTUNITY. THAT MAY GET A COUPLE OF

THAT MAY GET A COUPLE OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO VOTE TO

REPUBLICAN SENATORS TO VOTE TO HEAR THAT TESTIMONY.

HEAR THAT TESTIMONY. ALSO, THE LAST TWO DAYS HAVE

ALSO, THE LAST TWO DAYS HAVE SHOWN, ONCE AGAIN, HOW REPUGNANT

SHOWN, ONCE AGAIN, HOW REPUGNANT SOME POLITICAL FIGURES ARE

SOME POLITICAL FIGURES ARE WILLING TO BE ON THE HOUSE SIDE.

WILLING TO BE ON THE HOUSE SIDE. AS CHARLES PIERCE SAID, KARINE,

AS CHARLES PIERCE SAID, KARINE, ITS NOT A GREAT SECRET THAT A

ITS NOT A GREAT SECRET THAT A LOT OF SENATE REPUBLICANS SEE

LOT OF SENATE REPUBLICANS SEE THEIR HOUSE COUNTERPARTS AS,

THEIR HOUSE COUNTERPARTS AS, QUOTE, BAD SEEDS.

QUOTE, BAD SEEDS. AND WHEN YOU HAVE THEM RUNNING

AND WHEN YOU HAVE THEM RUNNING AROUND SAYING THAT DEMOCRATS

AROUND SAYING THAT DEMOCRATS LOVE TERRORISTS MORE THAN GOLD

LOVE TERRORISTS MORE THAN GOLD STAR PARENTS, AGAIN, IT JUST IS

STAR PARENTS, AGAIN, IT JUST IS ANOTHER MARK ON HOUSE

ANOTHER MARK ON HOUSE REPUBLICANS, ON THE REPUBLICAN

REPUBLICANS, ON THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THEMSELVES.

PARTY THEMSELVES. AND, IF YOU DONT THINK -- IM

AND, IF YOU DONT THINK -- IM NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU, BUT IF

NOT TALKING ABOUT YOU, BUT IF PEOPLE OUT THERE DONT THINK

PEOPLE OUT THERE DONT THINK THAT THAT DOESNT PLACE PRESSURE

THAT THAT DOESNT PLACE PRESSURE ON REPUBLICANS WHO DONT WANT TO

ON REPUBLICANS WHO DONT WANT TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT SORT OF

BE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT SORT OF ACTION, THOSE SORT OF WORDS WHO

ACTION, THOSE SORT OF WORDS WHO HAVE TO RUN STATEWIDE INSTEAD OF

HAVE TO RUN STATEWIDE INSTEAD OF A SAFELY GERRYMANDERED DISTRICT

A SAFELY GERRYMANDERED DISTRICT IN COLORADO, MAINE, CALIFORNIA,

IN COLORADO, MAINE, CALIFORNIA, THEN THEY DIDNT UNDERSTAND

THEN THEY DIDNT UNDERSTAND POLITICS.

POLITICS. THIS HAS BAN A BOOMEEN A BOOM, I

THIS HAS BAN A BOOMEEN A BOOM, I VERY POSITIVE FOR NANCY PELOSI

VERY POSITIVE FOR NANCY PELOSI AND THE DEMOCRATIC CAUSE.

AND THE DEMOCRATIC CAUSE. >> ONE THING YOU MENTIONED THAT

>> ONE THING YOU MENTIONED THAT CHARLIE PIERCE SAID IS NEARLY

CHARLIE PIERCE SAID IS NEARLY EVERY DAY THAT SHES HELD ON TO

EVERY DAY THAT SHES HELD ON TO THESE TWO PIECES OF ARTICLES

THESE TWO PIECES OF ARTICLES OF -- ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT

OF -- ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT WEVE HEARD MORE EXPLOSIVE

WEVE HEARD MORE EXPLOSIVE INFORMATION AND DETAILS.

INFORMATION AND DETAILS. BUT ANOTHER THING THAT HAS

BUT ANOTHER THING THAT HAS HAPPENED IS WE HAVE NOW HAD THIS

HAPPENED IS WE HAVE NOW HAD THIS NATIONAL CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW

NATIONAL CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW UNFAIR THIS TRIAL IS POTENTIALLY

UNFAIR THIS TRIAL IS POTENTIALLY GOING TO BE BECAUSE OF MITCH

GOING TO BE BECAUSE OF MITCH McCONNELL ESSENTIALLY SAYING HE

McCONNELL ESSENTIALLY SAYING HE IS GOING TO BE AN ACCOMPLICE FOR

IS GOING TO BE AN ACCOMPLICE FOR DONALD TRUMP, TO HELP DONALD

DONALD TRUMP, TO HELP DONALD TRUMP.

TRUMP. AND SO I THINK THAT IS REALLY

AND SO I THINK THAT IS REALLY KEY AND IMPORTANT.

KEY AND IMPORTANT. AND YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT.

AND YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT IT. IF MITCH McCONNELL IS SAYING

IF MITCH McCONNELL IS SAYING THAT, WHY WOULD NANCY PELOSI

THAT, WHY WOULD NANCY PELOSI HAND OVER THE TWO ARTICLES OF

HAND OVER THE TWO ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT WHEN HES SAYING

IMPEACHMENT WHEN HES SAYING HES GOING TO SET UP AN UNFAIR

HES GOING TO SET UP AN UNFAIR TRIAL?

TRIAL? BUT HERES THE THING, I THINK,

BUT HERES THE THING, I THINK, HERES THE THING, JOE.

HERES THE THING, JOE. I THINK AT THE END OF THE DAY

I THINK AT THE END OF THE DAY SHE IS GOING TO MOVE FORWARD.

SHE IS GOING TO MOVE FORWARD. CLEARLY SHE HAS TO GIVE FORTH

CLEARLY SHE HAS TO GIVE FORTH THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT.

THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT. I SAY IF I WERE HER, WHAT I TWO

I SAY IF I WERE HER, WHAT I TWO IS THE DAY THAT SHE DOES THAT,

IS THE DAY THAT SHE DOES THAT, SHE ALSO SUBPOENAS THE HOUSE

SHE ALSO SUBPOENAS THE HOUSE SUBPOENAS JOHN BOLTON TO

SUBPOENAS JOHN BOLTON TO TESTIFY.

TESTIFY. I MEAN, THERE ARE A BUNCH OF

I MEAN, THERE ARE A BUNCH OF THINGS THAT SHE CAN DO THAT --

THINGS THAT SHE CAN DO THAT -- AND WE KNOW SHES SMART AND

AND WE KNOW SHES SMART AND SHES STRATEGIC AND THIS IS WHAT

SHES STRATEGIC AND THIS IS WHAT SHE HAS SAID.

SHE HAS SAID. AND ONE LAST THING, TOO, IS WE

AND ONE LAST THING, TOO, IS WE FOUND OUT FROM THE PUBLIC THAT

FOUND OUT FROM THE PUBLIC THAT THEY WANT WITNESSES.

THEY WANT WITNESSES. THEY WANT A FAIR TRIAL.

THEY WANT A FAIR TRIAL. AND SO BY HOLDING ON TO THIS,

AND SO BY HOLDING ON TO THIS, SHE HAS REALLY HELPED US GET

SHE HAS REALLY HELPED US GET MORE INFORMATION OUT THERE,

MORE INFORMATION OUT THERE, HELPED THE PUBLIC SEE WHAT

HELPED THE PUBLIC SEE WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING ON.

EXACTLY IS GOING ON. AND TO AREAYOUR POINT, JOE, THER

AND TO AREAYOUR POINT, JOE, THER POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS FOR

POLITICAL RAMIFICATIONS FOR MITCH McCONNELL.

MITCH McCONNELL. HE HAS A VERY SMALL MARGIN OF

HE HAS A VERY SMALL MARGIN OF ERROR IF HE WANTS TO HOLD ON TO

ERROR IF HE WANTS TO HOLD ON TO THE MAJORITY.

THE MAJORITY. KANSAS IS POTENTIALLY NOW IN

KANSAS IS POTENTIALLY NOW IN PLAY BECAUSE POMPEO HAS SAID

PLAY BECAUSE POMPEO HAS SAID HES NOT GOING TO RUN FOR

HES NOT GOING TO RUN FOR SENATE, THE U.S. SENATE.

SENATE, THE U.S. SENATE. >> BY THE WAY, MITCH McCONNELL

>> BY THE WAY, MITCH McCONNELL SITTING AT WHAT?

SITTING AT WHAT? 18% IN HIS OWN STATE?

18% IN HIS OWN STATE? EVERYWHERE HE GOES HES HAD

EVERYWHERE HE GOES HES HAD PEOPLE SHOUTING IN OPEN RALLIES,

PEOPLE SHOUTING IN OPEN RALLIES, MOSCOW MITCH.

MOSCOW MITCH. HES GOING TO HAVE A HELL OF A

HES GOING TO HAVE A HELL OF A ROUGH RUN IN 2020.

ROUGH RUN IN 2020. I DONT CARE HOW COCKY PEOPLE

I DONT CARE HOW COCKY PEOPLE ARE THAT SEND OUT THE VIDEOS AND

ARE THAT SEND OUT THE VIDEOS AND SAY COCAINE MITCH.

SAY COCAINE MITCH. YOU KNOW WHAT SOME THOSE DOLLAR

YOU KNOW WHAT SOME THOSE DOLLAR BILLS THAT THEY HAVE GOING

BILLS THAT THEY HAVE GOING THROUGH THE COCAINE MITCH LITTLE

THROUGH THE COCAINE MITCH LITTLE VIDEO TRIBUTE, ITS GOING TO BE

VIDEO TRIBUTE, ITS GOING TO BE RUBLES BY THE FALL THAT HES

RUBLES BY THE FALL THAT HES COUNTING.

COUNTING. I MEAN, HES GOING TO BE UP FOR

I MEAN, HES GOING TO BE UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT.

A TOUGH FIGHT. CORY GARDNERS UP FOR A TOUGH

CORY GARDNERS UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT.

FIGHT. MARTHA McSALLY IS UP FOR A TOUGH

MARTHA McSALLY IS UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT.

FIGHT. SUSAN COLLINS, GOOD LORD SHES

SUSAN COLLINS, GOOD LORD SHES UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT.

UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT. THOM TILLIS IN NORTH CAROLINA

THOM TILLIS IN NORTH CAROLINA ALSO GOING TO BE UP FOR A TOUGH

ALSO GOING TO BE UP FOR A TOUGH FIGHT.

FIGHT. SO -- AND YOU LOOK AT THESE

SO -- AND YOU LOOK AT THESE NUMBERS, I MEAN, YOU KNOW, BY 20

NUMBERS, I MEAN, YOU KNOW, BY 20 PERCENTAGE POINTS.

PERCENTAGE POINTS. PEOPLE WANT TO SEE WITNESSES.

PEOPLE WANT TO SEE WITNESSES. >> THEY WANT TO HEAR MORE.

>> THEY WANT TO HEAR MORE. >> IN THE SENATE TRIAL.

>> IN THE SENATE TRIAL. YOU EVEN LOOK AT THAT POLL THAT

YOU EVEN LOOK AT THAT POLL THAT DONNY WAS TALKING ABOUT, BY 20

DONNY WAS TALKING ABOUT, BY 20 PERCENTAGE POINTS.

PERCENTAGE POINTS. PEOPLE THINK DONALD TRUMP WAS

PEOPLE THINK DONALD TRUMP WAS RECKLESS THIS PAST WEEK AS

RECKLESS THIS PAST WEEK AS COMMANDER AND CHIEF.

COMMANDER AND CHIEF. REPUBLICANS ARE RUNNING AROUND

REPUBLICANS ARE RUNNING AROUND CELEBRATING.

CELEBRATING. THEY DONT KNOW WHAT THEYRE

THEY DONT KNOW WHAT THEYRE CELEBRATING, MIKA.

CELEBRATING, MIKA. THEY DONT.

THEY DONT. THEYRE -- THEYRE GETTING

THEYRE -- THEYRE GETTING CRUSHED IN EVERY ONE OF THESE

CRUSHED IN EVERY ONE OF THESE POLLS.

POLLS. EVEN ON THE ISSUE OF

EVEN ON THE ISSUE OF IMPEACHMENT, THE MAJORITY OF

IMPEACHMENT, THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS BELIEVE DONALD TRUMP

AMERICANS BELIEVE DONALD TRUMP SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED.

SHOULD HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED. IN A LOT OF POLLS, INCLUDING THE

IN A LOT OF POLLS, INCLUDING THE FOX NEWS POLL, THEY WANT HIM

FOX NEWS POLL, THEY WANT HIM IMPEACHED AND ON REMOVED.

IMPEACHED AND ON REMOVED. THEYRE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF

THEYRE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF PUBLIC OPINION.

PUBLIC OPINION. THEYRE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF

THEYRE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.

HISTORY. AND WHILE THEY ARE STILL RUNNING

AND WHILE THEY ARE STILL RUNNING AROUND, I GUESS THEY CAN AFFORD

AROUND, I GUESS THEY CAN AFFORD TO IN JERRY MAN DER DISTRICTSGER

TO IN JERRY MAN DER DISTRICTSGER THE HOUSE, BUT YOU BETTER AT

THE HOUSE, BUT YOU BETTER AT LEAST PRETEND YOU WANT A TRIAL

LEAST PRETEND YOU WANT A TRIAL AND HEAR FROM THESE WITNESSES

AND HEAR FROM THESE WITNESSES AND GET THEM OVER THERE.

AND GET THEM OVER THERE. BECAUSE LET ME TELL YOU

BECAUSE LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING, IVE SEEN THIS BEFORE

SOMETHING, IVE SEEN THIS BEFORE WITH MY BUDDIES THAT WERE GOING

WITH MY BUDDIES THAT WERE GOING DOWN, MOSCOW MITCH WONT BE

DOWN, MOSCOW MITCH WONT BE THERE YOUR LAST TEN DAYS OF YOUR

THERE YOUR LAST TEN DAYS OF YOUR CAMPAIGN IN COLORADO.

CAMPAIGN IN COLORADO. HE WONT.

HE WONT. HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR

HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR HIS OWN POLITICAL LIFE.

HIS OWN POLITICAL LIFE. MOSCOW MITCH WONT BE SENDING

MOSCOW MITCH WONT BE SENDING MONEY TO MAINE.

MONEY TO MAINE. HES GOING TO BE LIKE FLOODING

HES GOING TO BE LIKE FLOODING IT INTO MEDIA MARKETS AROUND

IT INTO MEDIA MARKETS AROUND LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY, BECAUSE

LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY, BECAUSE HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR

HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR HIS POLITICAL LIFE.

HIS POLITICAL LIFE. MOSCOW MITCH, HE NOT GOING TO BE

MOSCOW MITCH, HE NOT GOING TO BE IN THE RESEARCH TRIANGLE IN

IN THE RESEARCH TRIANGLE IN NORTH CAROLINA CAMPAIGNING FOR

NORTH CAROLINA CAMPAIGNING FOR YOU, THOMMY, BOY, HES NOT GOING

YOU, THOMMY, BOY, HES NOT GOING TO BE THERE.

TO BE THERE. HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR

HES GOING TO BE FIGHTING FOR HIS OWN POLITICAL LIFE.

HIS OWN POLITICAL LIFE. SO IF YOU WANT THIS PRO STOS

SO IF YOU WANT THIS PRO STOS LOOK

LOOK PROCESS TO LOOK RIGGED, YOURE

PROCESS TO LOOK RIGGED, YOURE GOING TO PAY FOR.

GOING TO PAY FOR. LAST TEN DAYS OF YOUR CAMPAIGN.

LAST TEN DAYS OF YOUR CAMPAIGN. LOOK AT THE POLLS AND CHOOSE

LOOK AT THE POLLS AND CHOOSE WISELY.

WISELY. >> GOODNESS, ITS JUST FREE

>> GOODNESS, ITS JUST FREE ADVICE RIGHT THERE FOR YOU.

ADVICE RIGHT THERE FOR YOU. >> CHOOSE WISELY.

>> CHOOSE WISELY. YOU WANT THE KNIGHT TO SAY HE

YOU WANT THE KNIGHT TO SAY HE CHOSE WISELY.

CHOSE WISELY. YOU NEED TO CHOOSE WISE.

YOU NEED TO CHOOSE WISE. >> I "POLITICOS" JAKE SHERMAN,

>> I "POLITICOS" JAKE SHERMAN, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING ON

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING ON THIS MORNING.

THIS MORNING. >> INDIANA JONES AND FINAL

>> INDIANA JONES AND FINAL CRUSADE ONE OF THE BEST, WILLIE,

The Description of What Could 'Soon' Mean For The House Speaker? | Morning Joe | MSNBC