Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Senate report finds Clinton emails sent to cryptic Gmail

INVESTIGATION.

>> Gregg: THANK YOU FOR

BEING WITH ME.

JOINING ME NOW IS THE FORMER

ATTORNEY BRET TOLLMAN AND

FLORIDA CONGRESSMAN MATT

GAETZ.

THERE IS ALREADY A CRIMINAL

REFERRAL AGAINST NELLIE OHR

AND PROBABLY SHOULD BE ONE

AGAINST BRUCE OHR IN MY

JUDGMENT.

WE'LL WAIT TO SEE.

I WANT TO TACKLE ANOTHER

SUGGEST WITH YOU.

CONGRESSMAN GAETZ WE LEARNED

YOU CAN READ ABOUT IN "THE

DAILY CALLER" THAT ACCORDING

TO A SENATE REPORT, EVERY

SINGLE HILLARY CLINTON E-MAIL

WAS SENT SECRETLY TO A CRYPTIC

GMAIL ADDRESS, INCLUDING

CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS.

SO YOU HAVE POTENTIALLY

HUNDREDS IF NOT THOUSANDS OF

DOCUMENTS THAT ARE

SENSEIVETIVE, IF NOT

CLASSIFY -- SENSITIVE, IF NOT

CLASSIFIED THAT CAN BE HACKED

ON A GOOGLE SERVER.

INTELLIGENT AGENT DISCOVERED

IT.

NOTIFIED PETER STROZK WHO WAS

"DISINTERESTED AND

DISMISSIVE."

CONGRESSMAN, HOW CAN THAT BE?

>> THE REASON THIS IS THE CASE

IS BECAUSE THEY ALL THOUGHT

HILLARY CLINTON WAS GOING TO

WIN.

REMEMBER, GREGG, THE TRUMP

RUSSIA ALLEGATIONS WEREN'T THE

CRIME.

THEY WERE THE COVER-UP.

BECAUSE A LOT OF THE FOLKS AT

THE F.B.I. AND THE DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE THOUGHT THEY WOULD

BE RETALIATED AGAINST BY A

FUTURE PRESIDENT HILLARY

CLINTON IF THEY AGGRESSIVELY

PURSUED THE FACTS AND APPLIED

THE LAW WHEN IT RELATED TO HER

UNLAWFUL CONDUCT WITH HER

E-MAILS.

THE REASON WE GET THIS DRIP BY

DRIP IS YOU HAVE PEOPLE WHO

WERE PAVING A YELLOW BRICK

ROAD TO EXONERATION FOR

HILLARY CLINTON THEY SHOULD

HAVE BEEN DOING THEIR JOB.

THAT IS BECAUSE SUSAN G.

THAT IS BECAUSE JUSAN G.

THAT IS BECAUSE JAMAN G.

THAT IS BECAUSE JAMES G.

THAT IS BECAUSE JAMES C.

THAT IS BECAUSE JAMES COMEY

CURATED AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE

THEY WERE NOT DOING

INVESTIGATIONS AT THE F.B.I.

THEY WERE TRYING TO SHAPE

PUBLIC OPINION.

WHEN YOU SEE THE BIAS THAT WAS

SO EVIDENT OF THOSE

INVESTIGATING HILLARY CLINTON

THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THE

OUTCOME SHE WASN'T FORCED TO

ACCOUNT FOR THE BAD CONDUCT.

>> Gregg: IF YOU HAVE

CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS ON A

GOOGLE SERVER, I MEAN

EVERYBODY HAS GOT IT.

INCLUDING THE RUSSIANS.

WE NOW ALSO KNOW THAT THE

CHINESE APPARENTLY HACKED

HILLARY CLINTON'S CLASSIFIED

DOCUMENTS.

ONCE AGAIN, THE F.B.I. IS

NOTIFIED OF THIS.

THEY DIDN'T CARE.

ISN'T THAT JUST THE

QUINTESSENTIAL MALFEASANCES OF

THE F.B.I.?

>> I KNOW A HUNDRED AGENTS AND

EXECUTIVES OF THE F.B.I. THAT

WOULD HAVE REACTED DIFFERENTLY

THAN PETER STROZK DID.

AND WOULD HAVE PLACED THIS AT

THE TOP OF THEIR PRIORITY

LIST.

THE BOTTOM LINE ON CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION, THINK ABOUT THIS,

GREGG.

TAKING ANY CLASSIFIED

INFORMATION AND MISHANDLING IT

TO SUMMARIZE WHAT THE LAWS

STATE, MISHANDLING OF

CLASSIFIED INFORMATION IS A

CRIME IN THIS COUNTRY.

PERHAPS THE ONLY ONE THAT IS A

BIT RELIEVED TONIGHT IS

HILLARY CLINTON BECAUSE THE

STORY DOESN'T SEEM TO COME

BACK TO FOCUS ON THE FACT THAT

SHE HAS A PRIVATE SERVER.

AND THESE E-MAILS ARE ON A

PRIVATE SERVER.

THOSE E-MAILS END UP GOING TO

A MORE PUBLIC PLACE.

BY HER INSTRUCTION, YOU HAVE

TO BELIEVE IT'S BY HER

INSTRUCTION.

SHE HIRED THE COMPANY.

THEY PUT IT ON THE PUBLIC

PLACE FOR ANYONE TO

POTENTIALLY SEE IT.

LET'S FACE IT RIGHT NOW, AND

BACK THEN, CHINA IS ABSOLUTELY

ONE OF OUR TOP THREATS TO THIS

COUNTRY'S NATIONAL SECURITY.

>> Gregg: PAUL KOMBATA THE

I.T. GUY THAT WORKED FOR

HILLARY CLINTON.

UNBELIEVABLY, CONGRESSMAN, HE

GOT IMMUNITY FROM THE F.B.I.

IN EXCHANGE FOR NOTHING, WHICH

IN MY ALMOST 40 YEARS OF A

LAWYER I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF

THAT, NEVER SEEN THAT BEFORE.

HE GETS IMMUNITY FROM

PROSECUTION.

ABLE NOW

ANLE NOW

ANDE NOW

AND NNOW

AND NOWW

AND NOW HE IS REFUSING TO

COOPERATE OR EVEN TALK TO THE

D.O.J. INSPECTOR GENERAL.

>> WELL, WHEN WE IN THE

CONGRESS SAW THE IMMUNITY

DEALS THAT WERE GIVEN NOT ONLY

IN THIS INSTANCE BUT TO A

VARIETY OF OTHER HILLARY

CLINTON ASSOCIATES, YOU WONDER

WHAT WAS BARGAINED FOR.

IMMUNITY DEAL IS EXCHANGE FOR

EVIDENCE THAT LEADS TO A HIGH

PROFILE OR A HIGH PRIORITY

TARGET THAT THEY HAVE IN A

CASE.

BUT YOU SAW THE BLANKET

IMMUNITY DEALS GIVEN TO

PEOPLE.

IT DIDN'T GIVE THEM MORE OF AN

INCENTIVE.

IT CREATED LESS OF AN

INCENTIVE.

IT WAS DRAWN TO CRITIQUE BY

THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WHEN HE

ANALYZED THE BIAS THAT EXISTED

HERE AND THE EXTENT TO WHICH

THE BIAS COULD HAVE IMPACTED

THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE.

>> Gregg: YOU CAN HAVE THE

LAST WORD BECAUSE I HAVE 30

SECONDS LEFT.

THIS IS AS CROOKED AS THE DAY

IS LONG, ISN'T IT?

>> IT IS.

IN 20 YEARS OF PRACTICING

FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW, I WAS

NEVER ABLE TO GET BLANKET

IMMUNITY.

NOT FOR A COOPERATOR THAT I

WANTED D.O.J. TO GIVE

IMMUNITY.

NOT WHEN I BECAME A DEFENSE

ATTORNEY.

NOT FOR ANY OF MY CLIENTS.

THEY HAD LIMITED IMMUNITY AND

THEY ALWAYS HAD TO GIVE

SOMETHING UP THAT WAS

SUBSTANTIAL.

WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS FAILURE

THAT IS STARTING TO PERCOLATE

UP AT MULTIPLE LEVELS.

IT'S JUST THE BEGINNING.

>> Gregg: YEAH.

THIS WAS JAMES COMEY'S F.B.I.

THE SANCTIMONIOUS AND THE

GLORIOUS FORMER F.B.I.

DIRECTOR.