Wow, tremendous statement of the title, How to start this video having to comply
such high expectations? Achieve something different on youtube it's very difficult, and I'm just
Another creator of monotonous content. Good, Maybe my friend DemonZone can help me.
(Say hello) Don't worry, I can start For you if you want.
Beasters is an anime that became very popular In the last months. Some have arrived
to consider even the first furro anime somehow, because absolutely
All the characters are animals and not people, unlike other anime where they are seen
to people with ears and animal tails, or animals interacting with humans. By
what they consider something innovative. Even if zootopia comparisons also emerged
for the message it gives and social problems that you have, mainly about discrimination
between carnivores and herbivores. It is obvious that Beastars is aimed at a
public for young adults, animals and pretty colors are the only thing we could
consider close to a children's content, but whoever has seen the anime will notice
of the seriousness with which he touches the problems of discrimination and dual relationships
In societies. In this aspect you can remind us to the zootopia message, both works show us
societies where animals of all kinds They live together.
As a result of mixing two natures opposed and destined to conflict, a
discriminatory gap between carnivores and herbivores The big difference that Beastars makes
with Zootopia is his narrative while we could consider Zootopia something else
close to a realistic narrative, Beastars it has a much cruder narration where
the perspective taken to visualize the problems is even grotesque when revealing the
system failures or blind spots. In twelve few episodes we could see how it is that
smaller animals are under constant danger of being swallowed, carnivores
are subject to strong discrimination, traffic of whites where children are also found
which are treated like cattle. To say nothing of that all efforts to avoid consumption
meat only generated a huge market black of it, pointing out the impossibility
to avoid this, it is part of nature of carnivorous animals, and it gets dark
the attempt to find a utopia where Everyone could live together. Even within
the school existed a tense environment, which surprises knowing that it was an environment
much more controlled, even to the point in what seemed like a form of experimentation
where he tried to prove how viable it was the coexistence between both groups, because
they were isolated from outside and instructed under strict rules and a diet
perfectly regulated to make sure turn off the instincts of carnivores without
mention that some are even subjected to strict medical treatments through
of daily drug use to inhibit natural behaviors not accepted by
the society. Again here it shows that the problem,
seen by society, they are carnivores, Obviously herbivores, under this thought
they believe that society belongs to them, and they presume that they are helping those
marginalized to be better ethically, by what your "discrimination" is seen as
An act of kindness and altruistic. Carnivores are the problem, and you have to
repair them, their bodies are wrong, they are broken, they are immoral by nature and there are
have to repair them so they can coexist with we. To all this we add the different
winks to gender issues, in a seemingly conservative society. In fact,
I wouldn't be surprised if Beastars developed in a society of the 90´s.
The work is clearly a criticism of different progressive movements and the
ideas and measures raised to solve these problems in modern societies, usually
is implicit in the work, but there are some moments where it is shown explicitly
as in the moment when the character main shows that in that world you have to
apologize for being carnivorous, clear request by some current feminist movements.
But as we said before, it is a unrealistic story, but raw, showing
the dysfunctionalities of the society of a stark way the problems raised,
that's why the work can convey a feeling so sad or hopeless to the spectators.
Another way of understanding it is that the author tried to present a dystopian world but
I consider the idea that it is more accurate a critique of modern societies, mainly
to progressivism
What else can be said about this work? his performance when using the CGI for animation
3D was obviously an immense progress for this kind of animation but at the same time
a limitation when recreating some scenes This anime made an amazing breakthrough
with this type of technologies, being of the few projects that we could say that
they have pleased the public by using this technique. Previous works like Berserk and
Baki the grappler had strong reviews that did not condemn the series itself, but
to this animation technique, accusing her of ruining the product, however, in this
occasion, the public began to see 3D as something with great potential.
Somehow, Beastars managed to stand out among many other anime of the bunch for
all these characteristics, which gave him a dreary and raw dramatic plot for
the adult audience, creating a similar effect at Panty and Stocking with Garterbelt,
to stand out above all for the contrast who presented against the other animations
of his seasons. It is something that was presented so different that he showed himself for it. Such
once the fact that the manga author comes the film world has been something
that did not repeat the formulas already repeated.
Remember that in the description you will find Demon's channel and a review of the good
and the bad thing we did together about Beastars. And well friends, with nothing more to say
I'm Cartoon Mutant ... And I'm DemoZone And goodbye….
