Follow US:

Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Rand Paul: Trump's children should sue Schumer for defamation

Normal
(0)
Difficulty: 0

ISNT, WHO IS RIGHT? WHO DO WE THINK IS RIGHT?

WHO DO WE THINK IS RIGHT? WHO DO MOST REPUBLICANS THINK IS

WHO DO MOST REPUBLICANS THINK IS RIGHT?

RIGHT? >> Ed: YOU BEEN LISTENING TO

>> Ed: YOU BEEN LISTENING TO DEMOCRATIC MINORITY LEADER

DEMOCRATIC MINORITY LEADER CHUCK SCHUMER.

CHUCK SCHUMER. HES BEEN OUT EVERY DAY TRYING

HES BEEN OUT EVERY DAY TRYING TO GET AHEAD OF WHAT WE ARE

TO GET AHEAD OF WHAT WE ARE GOING TO BE HEARING -- HE SEEMED

GOING TO BE HEARING -- HE SEEMED TO EXPAND HIS ATTACKS ON THE

TO EXPAND HIS ATTACKS ON THE PRESIDENT THEREBY TALKING ABOUT

PRESIDENT THEREBY TALKING ABOUT BOLTONS BOOK, SPECIFICALLY NOW

BOLTONS BOOK, SPECIFICALLY NOW GOING AFTER THE PRESIDENTS

GOING AFTER THE PRESIDENTS CHILDREN.

CHILDREN. I BELIEVE WE STILL HAVE

I BELIEVE WE STILL HAVE REPUBLICAN SENATOR RAND PAUL.

REPUBLICAN SENATOR RAND PAUL. I WANT TO BRING YOU BEEN,

I WANT TO BRING YOU BEEN, BECAUSE WHEN YOU HEAR

BECAUSE WHEN YOU HEAR CHUCK SCHUMER SAYING THIS TALK

CHUCK SCHUMER SAYING THIS TALK IN THE BOLTON BOOK ABOUT MAYBE

IN THE BOLTON BOOK ABOUT MAYBE THE PRESIDENT WAS TOO FRIENDLY

THE PRESIDENT WAS TOO FRIENDLY TO CHINA, CHUCK SCHUMER SINGH

TO CHINA, CHUCK SCHUMER SINGH MAYBE WE NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT

MAYBE WE NEED TO TAKE A LOOK AT WHETHER THE PRESIDENTS CHILDREN

WHETHER THE PRESIDENTS CHILDREN PROFITED FROM THAT.

PROFITED FROM THAT. WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT

WHAT IS YOUR REACTION TO THAT AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR PUSH

AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR YOUR PUSH FOR HUNTER BIDEN COMING IN AS A

FOR HUNTER BIDEN COMING IN AS A WITNESS?

WITNESS? >> YOU KNOW, I AM OFFENDED AND

>> YOU KNOW, I AM OFFENDED AND SHOCKED THAT SCHUMER WOULD BE SO

SHOCKED THAT SCHUMER WOULD BE SO SCURRILOUS AS TO ACCUSE THE

SCURRILOUS AS TO ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CHILDREN OFF

PRESIDENT AND HIS CHILDREN OFF OF MAKING MONEY OFF OF POLITICS

OF MAKING MONEY OFF OF POLITICS WHEN THE ONLY PEOPLE WE KNOW

WHEN THE ONLY PEOPLE WE KNOW HAVE MADE MONEY OFF OF THIS HAVE

HAVE MADE MONEY OFF OF THIS HAVE BEEN UNDER BIDEN AND JOE BIDEN.

BEEN UNDER BIDEN AND JOE BIDEN. SO UNDER BED MAKES A MILLION

SO UNDER BED MAKES A MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR, THAT IS

DOLLARS A YEAR, THAT IS DOCUMENTED, BUT SCHUMER SIMPLY

DOCUMENTED, BUT SCHUMER SIMPLY CREATES AND MAKES UP AND SAYS,

CREATES AND MAKES UP AND SAYS, "MAYBE THE PRESIDENTS KIDS ARE

"MAYBE THE PRESIDENTS KIDS ARE MAKING MONEY."

MAKING MONEY." JOHN BOLTON IS MAKING MONEY AS

JOHN BOLTON IS MAKING MONEY AS WE SPEAK.

WE SPEAK. HE HAS PROBABLY ALREADY GOTTEN

HE HAS PROBABLY ALREADY GOTTEN THE SEVERAL MILLION DOLLAR

THE SEVERAL MILLION DOLLAR ADVANCE FOR THIS BOOK.

ADVANCE FOR THIS BOOK. HES MAKING MONEY BY TESTIFYING

HES MAKING MONEY BY TESTIFYING AGAINST THE PRESENT.

AGAINST THE PRESENT. THE ONLY PEOPLE WE KNOW WHO HAVE

THE ONLY PEOPLE WE KNOW WHO HAVE ACTUALLY MADE MONEY?

ACTUALLY MADE MONEY? HUNTER BIDEN AND NOW

HUNTER BIDEN AND NOW JOHN BOLTON.

JOHN BOLTON. JOHN BOLTON HAS NOT OBJECTED IN

JOHN BOLTON HAS NOT OBJECTED IN ANY WAY NOBODYS CASHING MILLION

ANY WAY NOBODYS CASHING MILLION DOLLAR CHECKS.

DOLLAR CHECKS. TO HAVE SCHUMER COME UP AND SAY

TO HAVE SCHUMER COME UP AND SAY OUT OF THE BLUE, "MAYBE THE

OUT OF THE BLUE, "MAYBE THE PRESIDENTS KIDS ARE MAKING

PRESIDENTS KIDS ARE MAKING MONEY," WITH NO EVIDENCE AT ALL,

MONEY," WITH NO EVIDENCE AT ALL, THATS DEFAMATION AND THEY OUGHT

THATS DEFAMATION AND THEY OUGHT TO SUE HIM.

TO SUE HIM. >> Ed: I HEAR THE ANGER IN

>> Ed: I HEAR THE ANGER IN YOUR VOICE.

YOUR VOICE. YOU THINK THIS IS A MISSTEP FOR

YOU THINK THIS IS A MISSTEP FOR SENATOR SCHUMER TO BRING THE

SENATOR SCHUMER TO BRING THE PRESIDENTS CHILDREN INTO THIS?

PRESIDENTS CHILDREN INTO THIS? >> ITS A TRANSFERENCE.

>> ITS A TRANSFERENCE. WEVE BEEN TALKING ALL ALONG

WEVE BEEN TALKING ALL ALONG ABOUT -- THE PRESIDENT ASKED

ABOUT -- THE PRESIDENT ASKED THAT CORRUPTION BE INVESTIGATED

THAT CORRUPTION BE INVESTIGATED IN UKRAINE AND THE EVIDENCE IS

IN UKRAINE AND THE EVIDENCE IS OUT THERE THAT HUNTER BIDEN IS

OUT THERE THAT HUNTER BIDEN IS GETTING A MILLION DOLLARS WHILE

GETTING A MILLION DOLLARS WHILE HIS DAD WAS BUSY FIRING THE

HIS DAD WAS BUSY FIRING THE PROSECUTOR THAT WAS GOING

PROSECUTOR THAT WAS GOING AFTER HUNTER BIDENS COMPANY.

AFTER HUNTER BIDENS COMPANY. THAT IS ALL IN THE RECORD.

THAT IS ALL IN THE RECORD. THERE IS NOTHING IN THE RECORD

THERE IS NOTHING IN THE RECORD ABOUT THE PRESIDENTS KIDS.

ABOUT THE PRESIDENTS KIDS. SCHUMER HAS JUST CREATED THIS

SCHUMER HAS JUST CREATED THIS WHOLE THING OUT OF -- "WHEN WE

WHOLE THING OUT OF -- "WHEN WE GO AFTER THE PRESIDENTS KIDS

GO AFTER THE PRESIDENTS KIDS YET?

YET? WE DONT KNOW WHETHER THE

WE DONT KNOW WHETHER THE DEALINGS HAVE SOMETHING TO DO

DEALINGS HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE TRUMPS MAKING MONEY."

WITH THE TRUMPS MAKING MONEY." HE COMPLETELY MADE UP.

HE COMPLETELY MADE UP. THATS DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER

THATS DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER AND HE OUGHT TO GO TO COURT AND

AND HE OUGHT TO GO TO COURT AND BE SUED FOR IT.

BE SUED FOR IT. >> Ed: LAST HOUR, SANDRA AND I

>> Ed: LAST HOUR, SANDRA AND I PRESSED DEMOCRATIC

PRESSED DEMOCRATIC SENATOR CHRIS VAN HOLLEN ON THE

SENATOR CHRIS VAN HOLLEN ON THE FACT THAT YOU AND OTHER

FACT THAT YOU AND OTHER REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN TALKING

REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN AS A WITNESS.

ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN AS A WITNESS. IT COULD BE MATERIAL HERE,

IT COULD BE MATERIAL HERE, BECAUSE THE FACT THAT THERE WAS

BECAUSE THE FACT THAT THERE WAS TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE

TESTIMONY IN THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE BY

INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE BY VARIOUS OFFICIALS LIKE MR. KENT,

VARIOUS OFFICIALS LIKE MR. KENT, THAT IN 2015 THERE WERE OBAMA

THAT IN 2015 THERE WERE OBAMA OFFICIALS ARE RAISING QUESTIONS

OFFICIALS ARE RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT WHETHER THERE WAS A

ABOUT WHETHER THERE WAS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR

CONFLICT OF INTEREST FOR HUNTER BIDEN.

HUNTER BIDEN. WHAT IS YOUR CASE FOR

WHAT IS YOUR CASE FOR HUNTER BIDEN COMING IN AS A

HUNTER BIDEN COMING IN AS A WITNESS?

WITNESS? >> THE LAW THAT GRANTED FOREIGN

>> THE LAW THAT GRANTED FOREIGN AID TO UKRAINE SAID THAT YOU

AID TO UKRAINE SAID THAT YOU HAVE TO CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE

HAVE TO CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE DOING BETTER ON CORRUPTION.

DOING BETTER ON CORRUPTION. HUNTER BIDEN IS ACCUSED OF

HUNTER BIDEN IS ACCUSED OF CORRUPTION, SO IS JOE BIDEN AND

CORRUPTION, SO IS JOE BIDEN AND UKRAINE.

UKRAINE. THEY ARE MATERIAL, THEY ARE

THEY ARE MATERIAL, THEY ARE RELEVANT.

RELEVANT. OF THE PRESENT WASNT JUST

OF THE PRESENT WASNT JUST GETTING CORRUPTION IN THE

GETTING CORRUPTION IN THE BIDENS WERE CORRUPT, HE WAS

BIDENS WERE CORRUPT, HE WAS DOING HIS JOB.

DOING HIS JOB. IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE

IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE BIDENS WERE CORRUPT, NOT ONE

BIDENS WERE CORRUPT, NOT ONE SCINTILLA, AS THE DEMOCRATS SAY,

SCINTILLA, AS THE DEMOCRATS SAY, LETS HAVE A FULL AIRING OF

LETS HAVE A FULL AIRING OF THAT.

THAT. HE BEGAN YESTERDAY, WE HAD

HE BEGAN YESTERDAY, WE HAD INTERESTING TESTIMONY YESTERDAY

INTERESTING TESTIMONY YESTERDAY THAT SHOWED JOHN KERRYS STEPSON

THAT SHOWED JOHN KERRYS STEPSON WAS INVOLVED, THAT HUNTER BIDEN

WAS INVOLVED, THAT HUNTER BIDEN WAS INVOLVED, AND THEY SHOWED

WAS INVOLVED, AND THEY SHOWED THAT THEY ACTUALLY NOTIFIED THE

THAT THEY ACTUALLY NOTIFIED THE STATE DEPARTMENT.

STATE DEPARTMENT. JOHN KERRYS SON-IN-LAW -- OR,

JOHN KERRYS SON-IN-LAW -- OR, STEPSON -- SAID HE WAS CONCERNED

STEPSON -- SAID HE WAS CONCERNED HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH

HE WANTED NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT HUNTER BIDEN --

WHAT HUNTER BIDEN -- >> Ed: SENATOR, REAL QUICK,

>> Ed: SENATOR, REAL QUICK, ARE WE HEADING FOR A LONG TRIAL

ARE WE HEADING FOR A LONG TRIAL NOW WITH WITNESSES ON BOTH

NOW WITH WITNESSES ON BOTH SIDES?

SIDES? YES OR NO?

YES OR NO? >> I THINK THERE ARE 50 VOTES TO

>> I THINK THERE ARE 50 VOTES TO HAVE NO WITNESSES AND ONE IN THE

The Description of Rand Paul: Trump's children should sue Schumer for defamation