Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman fired by National Security Council

Normal
(0)
Difficulty: 0

TRIES TO MAKE SURE WHATS GOING ON DOES NOT READ HERE,

ON DOES NOT READ HERE, MEANWHILE, OVER THE WHITE HOUSE

MEANWHILE, OVER THE WHITE HOUSE ON SEVEN FAST-MOVING

ON SEVEN FAST-MOVING DEVELOPMENTS THEY ARE

DEVELOPMENTS THEY ARE PARTICULARLY WITH THE

PARTICULARLY WITH THE ADMINISTRATION TAKING FULL

ADMINISTRATION TAKING FULL OFFENSE ON THE ECONOMY AND

OFFENSE ON THE ECONOMY AND INDEED ON THIS VIRUS.

INDEED ON THIS VIRUS. >> POST IMPEACHMENT ACQUITTAL IS

>> POST IMPEACHMENT ACQUITTAL IS A FACT THAT COLONEL VINDMAN WHO

A FACT THAT COLONEL VINDMAN WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT THE PHONE

HAD CONCERNS ABOUT THE PHONE CALL THE PRESIDENT HAD WITH THE

CALL THE PRESIDENT HAD WITH THE UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT AND BROUGHT

UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT AND BROUGHT THOSE TO THE LEAD COUNSEL HAS

THOSE TO THE LEAD COUNSEL HAS BEEN FIRED FROM HIS JOB AND

BEEN FIRED FROM HIS JOB AND ESCORTED FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.

ESCORTED FROM THE WHITE HOUSE. IN A STATEMENT GIVEN TO FOX NEWS

IN A STATEMENT GIVEN TO FOX NEWS BY HIS ATTORNEY, HE SAYS "THERE

BY HIS ATTORNEY, HE SAYS "THERE IS NO QUESTION IN THE MIND OF

IS NO QUESTION IN THE MIND OF ANY AMERICAN WHY THIS MANS JOB

ANY AMERICAN WHY THIS MANS JOB IS OVER, WHY THIS COUNTRY HAS

IS OVER, WHY THIS COUNTRY HAS ONE LAST SOLDIER, LIEUTENANT

ONE LAST SOLDIER, LIEUTENANT COLONEL VINDMAN WAS ASKED TO

COLONEL VINDMAN WAS ASKED TO LEAVE FOR TELLING THE TRUTH.

LEAVE FOR TELLING THE TRUTH. HIS HONOR AND HIS COMMITMENT TO

HIS HONOR AND HIS COMMITMENT TO WRITE FRIGHTENED THE POWERFUL."

WRITE FRIGHTENED THE POWERFUL." FOX HAD CONFIRMED THIS MORNING

FOX HAD CONFIRMED THIS MORNING THAT HE WAS NOT LONG FOR THE JOB

THAT HE WAS NOT LONG FOR THE JOB AND THE PRESIDENT WAS ASKED

AND THE PRESIDENT WAS ASKED ABOUT IT AS HE WAS ON THE WAY

ABOUT IT AS HE WAS ON THE WAY OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE EARLIER

OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE EARLIER TODAY ON HIS WAY TO

TODAY ON HIS WAY TO NORTH CAROLINA.

NORTH CAROLINA. HERES WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID.

HERES WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID. >> I AM NOT HAPPY WITH THEM.

>> I AM NOT HAPPY WITH THEM. AM I SUPPOSED TO BE HAPPY WITH

AM I SUPPOSED TO BE HAPPY WITH HIM?

HIM? HE WILL MAKE THAT DECISION, HE

HE WILL MAKE THAT DECISION, HE WILL MAKE A DECISION.

WILL MAKE A DECISION. >> THE PRESS SECRETARY HAD SAID

>> THE PRESS SECRETARY HAD SAID EARLIER THIS WEEK THAT SOME

EARLIER THIS WEEK THAT SOME PEOPLE MAY PAY FOR WHAT THE

PEOPLE MAY PAY FOR WHAT THE PRESIDENT WENT THROUGH, HE HAD

PRESIDENT WENT THROUGH, HE HAD BEEN DETAILED FOR THE

BEEN DETAILED FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE DEPARTMENT

WHITE HOUSE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, IT IS ASSUMED HE

OF DEFENSE, IT IS ASSUMED HE WILL GO BACK THERE DOUBLE

WILL GO BACK THERE DOUBLE CHECKING ON THAT.

CHECKING ON THAT. ALSO TODAY A BIG VICTORY FOR THE

ALSO TODAY A BIG VICTORY FOR THE PRESIDENT, THE D.C. CIRCUIT

PRESIDENT, THE D.C. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THREE-JUDGE PANEL UNANIMOUSLY

THREE-JUDGE PANEL UNANIMOUSLY THROWING OUT THE EMOLUMENTS

THROWING OUT THE EMOLUMENTS LAWSUIT AGAINST HIM, DOZENS OF

LAWSUIT AGAINST HIM, DOZENS OF DEMOCRATIC SENATORS HAD JOINED

DEMOCRATIC SENATORS HAD JOINED THAT LAWSUIT CHARGING THE

THAT LAWSUIT CHARGING THE PRESIDENT WAS MAKING MONEY FROM

PRESIDENT WAS MAKING MONEY FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AND A NUMBER

FOREIGN GOVERNMENT AND A NUMBER OF PLACES INCLUDING THE TRUMP

OF PLACES INCLUDING THE TRUMP INTERNATIONAL HOTEL HERE IN

INTERNATIONAL HOTEL HERE IN WASHINGTON.

WASHINGTON. THE D.C. CIRCUIT DID NOT DECIDE

THE D.C. CIRCUIT DID NOT DECIDE THE CASE ON THE MERITS, THEY

THE CASE ON THE MERITS, THEY SIMPLY ROLLED THE INDIVIDUAL

SIMPLY ROLLED THE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DID NOT HAVE

MEMBERS OF CONGRESS DID NOT HAVE STANDING TO FILE THE SUIT

STANDING TO FILE THE SUIT BECAUSE THEY DID NOT REPRESENT A

BECAUSE THEY DID NOT REPRESENT A MAJORITY OF EITHER HOUSE.

MAJORITY OF EITHER HOUSE. THE PRESIDENT THIS MORNING STILL

THE PRESIDENT THIS MORNING STILL TAKING IT AS A WIN, LISTEN HERE.

TAKING IT AS A WIN, LISTEN HERE. >> IT WAS A TOTAL WIN BROUGHT BY

>> IT WAS A TOTAL WIN BROUGHT BY 230 DEMOCRATS AND CONGRESS ON

230 DEMOCRATS AND CONGRESS ON EMOLUMENTS, ANOTHER PHONY CASE

EMOLUMENTS, ANOTHER PHONY CASE AND WE WON 3-0, WON UNANIMOUSLY.

AND WE WON 3-0, WON UNANIMOUSLY. >> SENATE JUDICIARY MEMBER FROM

>> SENATE JUDICIARY MEMBER FROM CONNECTICUT INDICATED THE FIGHT

CONNECTICUT INDICATED THE FIGHT MIGHT NOT BE OVER IN A SERIES OF

MIGHT NOT BE OVER IN A SERIES OF TWEETS TODAY SAYING "TODAYS

TWEETS TODAY SAYING "TODAYS DECISION WAS NOT BASED ON MERITS

DECISION WAS NOT BASED ON MERITS THAT HE HAS VIOLATED IT AND

THAT HE HAS VIOLATED IT AND NOTHING CHANGES THE FUNDAMENTAL

NOTHING CHANGES THE FUNDAMENTAL FACTS HE HAS FREQUENTLY VIOLATED

FACTS HE HAS FREQUENTLY VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION.

THE CONSTITUTION. THE PRESIDENT ALSO WEIGHING IN

THE PRESIDENT ALSO WEIGHING IN THIS MORNING FOR THE FIRST TIME

THIS MORNING FOR THE FIRST TIME ON NANCY PELOSI ON TUESDAY NIGHT

ON NANCY PELOSI ON TUESDAY NIGHT RIPPING UP HER COPY OF HIS STATE

RIPPING UP HER COPY OF HIS STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS.

OF THE UNION ADDRESS. LISTEN TO WHAT THE PRESIDENT

LISTEN TO WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID.

SAID. >> I THOUGHT IT WAS A TERRIBLE

>> I THOUGHT IT WAS A TERRIBLE THING WHEN SHE RIPPED UP THE

THING WHEN SHE RIPPED UP THE SPEECH.

SPEECH. FIRST OF ALL, ITS AN OFFICIAL

FIRST OF ALL, ITS AN OFFICIAL DOCUMENT, SHE BROKE THE LAW.

DOCUMENT, SHE BROKE THE LAW. >> THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS THAT SHE

>> THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS THAT SHE BROKE THE LAW BUT MANY LEGAL

BROKE THE LAW BUT MANY LEGAL SCHOLARS SAY BECAUSE THAT WAS A

SCHOLARS SAY BECAUSE THAT WAS A COURTESY COPY OF THE SPEECH AND

COURTESY COPY OF THE SPEECH AND NOT AN OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL

NOT AN OFFICIAL PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENT WHILE THE

DOCUMENT WHILE THE APPROPRIATENESS OF WHAT SHE DID

APPROPRIATENESS OF WHAT SHE DID COULD BE DEBATED, NO LAWS WERE

COULD BE DEBATED, NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.

BROKEN. BUT A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE

The Description of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman fired by National Security Council