Follow US:

Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Investigations Multiply As President Donald Trump Scandals Spiral Wider | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC

(0)
Difficulty: 0

>>> WE WILL BE BACK TOMORROW NIGHT AT 8:00 P.M.

NIGHT AT 8:00 P.M. \S

\S >>> THANK YOU AT HOME FOR

>>> THANK YOU AT HOME FOR JOINING US.

JOINING US. HAPPY MONDAY.

HAPPY MONDAY. WE START TONIGHT WITH RALPH

WE START TONIGHT WITH RALPH WILSON.

WILSON. WHO?

WHO? HE GREW UP IN DETROIT.

HE GREW UP IN DETROIT. IF YOU KNOW THE NAME, YOU DO NOT

IF YOU KNOW THE NAME, YOU DO NOT ASSOCIATE HIM WITH THE CITY OF

ASSOCIATE HIM WITH THE CITY OF DETROIT, BECAUSE RALPH WILSON IS

DETROIT, BECAUSE RALPH WILSON IS FAMOUS FOR HAVING FOUNDED THE

FAMOUS FOR HAVING FOUNDED THE BUFFALO BILLS.

BUFFALO BILLS. LEGENDARY PLAYERS LIKE JIM

LEGENDARY PLAYERS LIKE JIM KELLY, O.J. SIMPSON AND JACK

KELLY, O.J. SIMPSON AND JACK KEMP PLAYED FOR THE BUFFALO

KEMP PLAYED FOR THE BUFFALO BILLS ON RALPH WILSONS WATCH.

BILLS ON RALPH WILSONS WATCH. WHEN RALPH WILSON DIED IN 2014

WHEN RALPH WILSON DIED IN 2014 AT THE AGE OF 95, HE HAD OWNED

AT THE AGE OF 95, HE HAD OWNED THAT TEAM FOR 54 YEARS.

THAT TEAM FOR 54 YEARS. THAT ICONIC TEAM CAME UP UP FOR

THAT ICONIC TEAM CAME UP UP FOR SALE HE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER,

SALE HE FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER, ONLY WHEN RALPH WILSON DIED.

ONLY WHEN RALPH WILSON DIED. THAT TEAM WAS FOR SALE, AND A

THAT TEAM WAS FOR SALE, AND A MOTLEY CRUE LINED UP TO TRY AND

MOTLEY CRUE LINED UP TO TRY AND BUY THE TEAM.

BUY THE TEAM. KNOW

KNOW NOT MOTLEY CRUE, THE BAND, BUT A

NOT MOTLEY CRUE, THE BAND, BUT A MOTLEY CREW OF PEOPLE.

MOTLEY CREW OF PEOPLE. THE PERSON WHO OWNED PABST BLUE

THE PERSON WHO OWNED PABST BLUE RIBBON.

RIBBON. ALSO JON BON JOVI, ALSO

ALSO JON BON JOVI, ALSO DONALD TRUMP, WHO HE KNOW FROM

DONALD TRUMP, WHO HE KNOW FROM OTHER CONTEXTS.

OTHER CONTEXTS. SO ALL OF THESE FOLKS WERE

SO ALL OF THESE FOLKS WERE LINING UP TO TRY TO BUY THE

LINING UP TO TRY TO BUY THE BILLS.

BILLS. IT HAD NEVER BEEN ON THE MARKET

IT HAD NEVER BEEN ON THE MARKET BEFORE.

BEFORE. NFL TEAMS NEVER COME ON THE

NFL TEAMS NEVER COME ON THE MARKET, BUT IN PARTICULAR THE

MARKET, BUT IN PARTICULAR THE BILLS.

BILLS. WHEN THAT TEAM CAME UP IN 2014,

WHEN THAT TEAM CAME UP IN 2014, IT WAS ALWAYS GOING TO BE LIKE A

IT WAS ALWAYS GOING TO BE LIKE A RICH GUY STREET BRAWL, RIGHT?

RICH GUY STREET BRAWL, RIGHT? IT GOT PARTICULARLY NASTY

IT GOT PARTICULARLY NASTY BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JON BON

BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JON BON JOVI.

JOVI. RUMORS STARTED CIRCLING THAT IF

RUMORS STARTED CIRCLING THAT IF BON JOVI GOT THE TEAM, HE WAS

BON JOVI GOT THE TEAM, HE WAS PLANNING TO MOVE THE BUFFALO

PLANNING TO MOVE THE BUFFALO BILLS TO CANADA.

BILLS TO CANADA. WHAT?

WHAT? THAT WAS NOT TRUE, BUT THE

THAT WAS NOT TRUE, BUT THE RUMORS DIDNT DERIVE FROM

RUMORS DIDNT DERIVE FROM ANYTHING TRUE THAT HAD BEEN

ANYTHING TRUE THAT HAD BEEN MISCONSTRUED.

MISCONSTRUED. THOSE WERE GINED UP BY A

THOSE WERE GINED UP BY A LONGTIME POLITICAL OPERATIVE

LONGTIME POLITICAL OPERATIVE NAMED MICHAEL CAPUTO, WHO HAS

NAMED MICHAEL CAPUTO, WHO HAS TIES TO ROGER STONE AND PAUL

TIES TO ROGER STONE AND PAUL MANAFORT.

MANAFORT. THAT IS THE GUY TRUMP SENT INTO

THAT IS THE GUY TRUMP SENT INTO BUFFALO TO TRY TO KNEECAP JON

BUFFALO TO TRY TO KNEECAP JON BON JOVI SO HE COULD

BON JOVI SO HE COULD OUT-MANEUVER HIM AND COULD BUY

OUT-MANEUVER HIM AND COULD BUY THE BILLS.

THE BILLS. NONE OF THAT MATTER IN THE END.

NONE OF THAT MATTER IN THE END. MR. BON JOVI AND MR. TRUMP BOTH

MR. BON JOVI AND MR. TRUMP BOTH LOST OUT TO THE NATURAL GAS

LOST OUT TO THE NATURAL GAS BILLIONAIRE, WHO WAS THE ONE WHO

BILLIONAIRE, WHO WAS THE ONE WHO ENDED UP BUYING THE BILLS AND

ENDED UP BUYING THE BILLS AND DID KEEP THE TEAM IN BUFFALO.

DID KEEP THE TEAM IN BUFFALO. THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE END OF

THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN THE END OF IT.

IT. TRUMP LOST, DIRTY TRICKS DIDNT

TRUMP LOST, DIRTY TRICKS DIDNT WORK, DIDNT GET THERE ANYWAY,

WORK, DIDNT GET THERE ANYWAY, STORY OVER.

STORY OVER. EXCEPT NOW THAT STORY IS BACK.

EXCEPT NOW THAT STORY IS BACK. >> DID THIS INFORMATION PROVIDED

>> DID THIS INFORMATION PROVIDED TO US INFLATE THE PRESIDENTS

TO US INFLATE THE PRESIDENTS ASSETS?

ASSETS? >> I BELIEVE THESE NUMBERS ARE

>> I BELIEVE THESE NUMBERS ARE INFLATED.

INFLATED. >> AND OF COURSE INFLATING

>> AND OF COURSE INFLATING ASSETS TO WIN A NEWSPAPER POLL

ASSETS TO WIN A NEWSPAPER POLL TO BOOST YOUR EYE GO IS NOT A

TO BOOST YOUR EYE GO IS NOT A CRIME, BUT TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE,

CRIME, BUT TO YOUR KNOWLEDGE, DID THE PRESIDENT EVER PROVIDE

DID THE PRESIDENT EVER PROVIDE INFLATED ASSETS TO A BANK IN

INFLATED ASSETS TO A BANK IN ORDER TO HELP HIM OBTAIN A LOAN?

ORDER TO HELP HIM OBTAIN A LOAN? >> THE GENTLEMANS TIME HAS

>> THE GENTLEMANS TIME HAS EXPIRED, BUT YOU MAY ANSWER THAT

EXPIRED, BUT YOU MAY ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

QUESTION. >> THESE DOCUMENTS AND OTHERS

>> THESE DOCUMENTS AND OTHERS WERE PROVIDED TO DEUTSCHE BANK

WERE PROVIDED TO DEUTSCHE BANK ON WITHINONE OCCASION WITH THEM,

ON WITHINONE OCCASION WITH THEM, OUR ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN MONEY TO

OUR ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN MONEY TO PUT A BID ON THE BUFFALO BILLS.

PUT A BID ON THE BUFFALO BILLS. >> MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFYING

>> MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFYING BEFORE CONGRESS.

BEFORE CONGRESS. HEARING IN THAT TESTIMONY THAT

HEARING IN THAT TESTIMONY THAT THE FUTURE PRESIDENT,

THE FUTURE PRESIDENT, DONALD TRUMP, MAY HAVE LIED IN A

DONALD TRUMP, MAY HAVE LIED IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT ABOUT THE

FINANCIAL STATEMENT ABOUT THE SIZE OF HIS ASSETS TO TRY TO GET

SIZE OF HIS ASSETS TO TRY TO GET A BANK LOAN TO BUY THE BUFFALO

A BANK LOAN TO BUY THE BUFFALO BILLS, I MEAN, ITS OBVIOUSLY

BILLS, I MEAN, ITS OBVIOUSLY EMBARRASSING, RIGHT?

EMBARRASSING, RIGHT? FOR THE PRESIDENT?

FOR THE PRESIDENT? BECAUSE HE DIDNT END UP BEING

BECAUSE HE DIDNT END UP BEING ABLE TO BUY THE BUFFALO BILLS,

ABLE TO BUY THE BUFFALO BILLS, BUT ITS ALSO POTENTIAL

BUT ITS ALSO POTENTIAL IMPORTANT LEGALLY.

IMPORTANT LEGALLY. IF THEY PROVIDED FINANCIAL

IF THEY PROVIDED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO THE BANK, TRYING

STATEMENTS TO THE BANK, TRYING TO PERSUADE THAT BANK TO GIVE

TO PERSUADE THAT BANK TO GIVE HIM A LOAN WITH FALSE

HIM A LOAN WITH FALSE REPRESENTATIONS, I MEAN, THAT IS

REPRESENTATIONS, I MEAN, THAT IS THE KIND OF THING THAT

THE KIND OF THING THAT PROSECUTORS CALL BANK FRAUD.

PROSECUTORS CALL BANK FRAUD. THATS PART OF WHAT MICHAEL

THATS PART OF WHAT MICHAEL COHEN AND TRUMP CAMPAIGN CHAIR

COHEN AND TRUMP CAMPAIGN CHAIR PAUL MANAFORT ARE GOING TO

PAUL MANAFORT ARE GOING TO PRISON FOR NOW.

PRISON FOR NOW. LAST WEEK LETITIA JAMES ISSUED

LAST WEEK LETITIA JAMES ISSUED SUBPOENAS TO TWO BANKS,

SUBPOENAS TO TWO BANKS, INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT AS

INCLUDING THE PRESIDENT AS PERSONAL LONGTIME LENDER

PERSONAL LONGTIME LENDER DEUTSCHE BANK, CITING TESTIMONY

DEUTSCHE BANK, CITING TESTIMONY FROM MICHAEL COHEN ABOUT INFLATE

FROM MICHAEL COHEN ABOUT INFLATE INFLATED ASSETS.

INFLATED ASSETS. MORTGAGES, LINES OF CREDITS AND

MORTGAGES, LINES OF CREDITS AND OTHER FINANCING TRANSACTIONS IN

OTHER FINANCING TRANSACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE TRUMP HOTEL,

CONNECTION WITH THE TRUMP HOTEL, THE

THE THE DO REAL OUTSIDE MIAMI, AND

THE DO REAL OUTSIDE MIAMI, AND THE TRUMP TOWER IN CHICAGO, AND

THE TRUMP TOWER IN CHICAGO, AND ALSO THAT WEIRD FAILED EFFORT TO

ALSO THAT WEIRD FAILED EFFORT TO BUY THE BUFFALO BILLS WITH WHAT

BUY THE BUFFALO BILLS WITH WHAT THE PRESIDENTS LAWYER SAYS WAS

THE PRESIDENTS LAWYER SAYS WAS AN INFLATED ASSET SHEET.

AN INFLATED ASSET SHEET. >>> TONIGHT THE "NEW YORK TIMES"

>>> TONIGHT THE "NEW YORK TIMES" HAS NEW REPORTING.

HAS NEW REPORTING. "NEW YORK TIMES" HAS JUST

"NEW YORK TIMES" HAS JUST REPORTED NEW REPORTING THAT

REPORTED NEW REPORTING THAT SUGGESTS A SURPRISE TWIST IN

SUGGESTS A SURPRISE TWIST IN THAT ALREADY WEIRD STORY,

THAT ALREADY WEIRD STORY, BECAUSE IF PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS

BECAUSE IF PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS INFLATING HIS ASSETS IN HIS

INFLATING HIS ASSETS IN HIS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO MAIM

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS TO MAIM HICK SOLEMN APPEAR RICHER SO AS

HICK SOLEMN APPEAR RICHER SO AS TO PERSUADE THIS BANK TO MAKE A

TO PERSUADE THIS BANK TO MAKE A LARGE LOAN, IN THEORIES AT LEAST

LARGE LOAN, IN THEORIES AT LEAST YOU WOULD EXPECT THE BANKING TO

YOU WOULD EXPECT THE BANKING TO MAD ABOUT IT.

MAD ABOUT IT. WHAT THE ATTORNEY APPEARS TO BE

WHAT THE ATTORNEY APPEARS TO BE INVESTIGATING IS TRUMP WAS LYING

INVESTIGATING IS TRUMP WAS LYING ABOUT ASSETS.

ABOUT ASSETS. NOW, THE SURPRISE TWIST TONIGHT

NOW, THE SURPRISE TWIST TONIGHT REPORTED IN "NEW YORK TIMES" IS

REPORTED IN "NEW YORK TIMES" IS THAT APPARENTLY DEUTSCHE BANK

THAT APPARENTLY DEUTSCHE BANK DIDNT MIND, AT LEAST THEY

DIDNT MIND, AT LEAST THEY DIDNT MIND ATTACH.

DIDNT MIND ATTACH. ACCORDING TO THIS REPORTING IN

ACCORDING TO THIS REPORTING IN THE TIMES TONIGHT, DEUTSCHE BANK

THE TIMES TONIGHT, DEUTSCHE BANK KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING IN THAT

KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING IN THAT BUFFALO BILLS SCAM AND THEY WERE

BUFFALO BILLS SCAM AND THEY WERE SORT OF COOL WITH IT.

SORT OF COOL WITH IT. QUOTE -- IN EARLY 2014, MR.

QUOTE -- IN EARLY 2014, MR. TRUMP AND MICHAEL COHEN

TRUMP AND MICHAEL COHEN APPROACHED A DEUTSCHE BANK

APPROACHED A DEUTSCHE BANK EXECUTIVE ABOUT MORE POTENTIAL

EXECUTIVE ABOUT MORE POTENTIAL LOANS.

LOANS. THE NFL FRANCHISE WAS UP FOR

THE NFL FRANCHISE WAS UP FOR SALE.

SALE. MR. TRUMP WAS INTERESTED AND HE

MR. TRUMP WAS INTERESTED AND HE NEEDED TO SHOW THE NFL THAT HE

NEEDED TO SHOW THE NFL THAT HE HAD THE FINANCIAL WHEREWITHAL TO

HAD THE FINANCIAL WHEREWITHAL TO BULL OFF A TRANSACTION THAT

BULL OFF A TRANSACTION THAT COULD TOP A BILLION DOLLARS.

COULD TOP A BILLION DOLLARS. MR. TRUMP ASKED MS. VRABLIC AT

MR. TRUMP ASKED MS. VRABLIC AT DEUTSCHE BANK IF THE BANK WOULD

DEUTSCHE BANK IF THE BANK WOULD BE WILLING TO MAKE A LOAN AND

BE WILLING TO MAKE A LOAN AND HANDED OVER BARE-BONES

HANDED OVER BARE-BONES STATEMENTS.

STATEMENTS. MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFIED THAT THE

MICHAEL COHEN TESTIFIED THAT THE DOCUMENTS EXAGGERATED TRUMPS

DOCUMENTS EXAGGERATED TRUMPS WEALTH.

WEALTH. DEUTSCHE BANK EXECUTIVES HAD

DEUTSCHE BANK EXECUTIVES HAD REACHED A SIMILAR CONCLUSION,

REACHED A SIMILAR CONCLUSION, MEAN THEY ALSO CONCLUDED THAT

MEAN THEY ALSO CONCLUDED THAT TRUMP WAS EXAGGERATING HIS

TRUMP WAS EXAGGERATING HIS WEALTH IN THIS LOAN APPLICATION.

WEALTH IN THIS LOAN APPLICATION. NEVERTHELESS THEY AGREED TO

NEVERTHELESS THEY AGREED TO VOUCH FOR REPLY TRUMPS BID-- MR

VOUCH FOR REPLY TRUMPS BID-- MR BID TO PURCHASE THE BUFFALO

BID TO PURCHASE THE BUFFALO BILLS.

BILLS. SO THEY SAID HIS WAS GOOD FOR

SO THEY SAID HIS WAS GOOD FOR THE MONEY?

THE MONEY? WHATS BEING REPORTED IS

WHATS BEING REPORTED IS DEUTSCHE BANK KNEW THAT TRUMP

DEUTSCHE BANK KNEW THAT TRUMP WAS LYING ABOUT WHETHER HE COULD

WAS LYING ABOUT WHETHER HE COULD AFFORD A LONE, OR THEY CAKE TO

AFFORD A LONE, OR THEY CAKE TO THE CONCLUSION HE WAS LYING IN

THE CONCLUSION HE WAS LYING IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HE

THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS HE SUPPORTED.

SUPPORTED. HE MATERIALLY MISREPRESENTED HIS

HE MATERIALLY MISREPRESENTED HIS WEALTH, HI ASSETS AND ABILITY TO

WEALTH, HI ASSETS AND ABILITY TO REPAY THE LOAN, BUT EH, THEY

REPAY THE LOAN, BUT EH, THEY DECIDED TO DO IT ANYWAY.

DECIDED TO DO IT ANYWAY. WHAT?

WHAT? WHO ELSE GETS TO LIVE IN THAT

WHO ELSE GETS TO LIVE IN THAT WORLD?

WORLD? WHERE DO I GET TO SIGN UP FOR

WHERE DO I GET TO SIGN UP FOR THAT?

THAT? I MEAN, FIRST OF ALL, WHAT

I MEAN, FIRST OF ALL, WHAT EXPLAINS THAT?

EXPLAINS THAT? IS THAT JUST THE WAY THAT BANKS

IS THAT JUST THE WAY THAT BANKS BRAY?

BRAY? IT WOULD SEEM LIKE IT WOULDNT

IT WOULD SEEM LIKE IT WOULDNT BE OR THEY WOULDNT STAY BANKS

BE OR THEY WOULDNT STAY BANKS FOR TOO LONG.

FOR TOO LONG. THERES ALSO THE QUESTION OF THE

THERES ALSO THE QUESTION OF THE POTENTIAL CRIMINAL

POTENTIAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS HERE, RIGHT?

INVESTIGATIONS HERE, RIGHT? THIS BUFFALO BILLS TRANSACTION

THIS BUFFALO BILLS TRANSACTION IS REPORTEDLY THE SUBJECT OF A

IS REPORTEDLY THE SUBJECT OF A SUBPOENA FROM THE NEW YORK

SUBPOENA FROM THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL TO THIS BANK.

ATTORNEY GENERAL TO THIS BANK. THE BANK SAYS ITS COOPERATING.

THE BANK SAYS ITS COOPERATING. IS IT STILL BANK FRAUD IF THE

IS IT STILL BANK FRAUD IF THE BANK IS IN ON IT?

BANK IS IN ON IT? IF THE BANK IS IN ON THIS, WHY

IF THE BANK IS IN ON THIS, WHY WOULD THEY DO IT?

WOULD THEY DO IT? ITS VERY STRANGE.

ITS VERY STRANGE. WE REALLY DONT KNOW WHAT WAS

WE REALLY DONT KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON BETWEEN DEUTSCHE BANK

GOING ON BETWEEN DEUTSCHE BANK AND DONALD TRUMP IN THAT

AND DONALD TRUMP IN THAT TRANSACTION, BUT ALSO OVER THE

TRANSACTION, BUT ALSO OVER THE COURSE OF THEIR LONG

COURSE OF THEIR LONG RELATIONSHIP WHERE EVERY OTHER

RELATIONSHIP WHERE EVERY OTHER BANK ON WALL STREET HAD SWORN

BANK ON WALL STREET HAD SWORN HIM OFF, BUT DEUTSCHE BANK KEPT

HIM OFF, BUT DEUTSCHE BANK KEPT SHOVELING HIM MONEY.

SHOVELING HIM MONEY. SOMETHING WAS WEIRD.

SOMETHING WAS WEIRD. SOMETHING DIDNT MAKE SENSE IN

SOMETHING DIDNT MAKE SENSE IN PURE FINANCIAL TERMS.

PURE FINANCIAL TERMS. GOING ALONG WITH THE LOAN THAT

GOING ALONG WITH THE LOAN THAT HE WAS LIE BEING, IS WEIRD.

HE WAS LIE BEING, IS WEIRD. THE TIMES ALSO REPORTED IN

THE TIMES ALSO REPORTED IN ANOTHER LOAN, THEY DISCOVERED

ANOTHER LOAN, THEY DISCOVERED THAT SOMEBODY HAD FORGED THE

THAT SOMEBODY HAD FORGED THE SIGNATURE OF A CREDIT OFFICER

SIGNATURE OF A CREDIT OFFICER WHO SUPPOSEDLY HAD APPROVED A

WHO SUPPOSEDLY HAD APPROVED A DEAL THAT WAS WORTH HUNDREDS OF

DEAL THAT WAS WORTH HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS TO TRUMP.

MILLIONS TO TRUMP. THATS A BIT OF A RED FLAG.

THATS A BIT OF A RED FLAG. TRUMP DEFAULT ODD HIS DEALS WITH

TRUMP DEFAULT ODD HIS DEALS WITH DEUTSCHE BANK.

DEUTSCHE BANK. HE LIED TO DEUTSCHE BANK AND HE

HE LIED TO DEUTSCHE BANK AND HE KNEW IT.

KNEW IT. HE SUED TO AVOID PAYING BACK

HE SUED TO AVOID PAYING BACK LOANS.

LOANS. AT LEAST ONE BANKER WHO DID

AT LEAST ONE BANKER WHO DID MULTIPLE DEALS WITH TRUMP WAS

MULTIPLE DEALS WITH TRUMP WAS FIRED FROM THE BANK APPARENTLY

FIRED FROM THE BANK APPARENTLY FOR MISCONDUCT.

FOR MISCONDUCT. BUT SOMEHOW THEY KEPT MANAGING

BUT SOMEHOW THEY KEPT MANAGING TO SHOVE MORE MONEY HIS WAY.

TO SHOVE MORE MONEY HIS WAY. WELL OVER $2 BILLION IN TOTAL.

WELL OVER $2 BILLION IN TOTAL. NOW THAT THE RELATIONSHIP IS

NOW THAT THE RELATIONSHIP IS UNDER INVESTIGATION BY

UNDER INVESTIGATION BY COMMITTEES AND THE NEW YORK

COMMITTEES AND THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY, THE EXECUTIVE WHO

ATTORNEY, THE EXECUTIVE WHO TRUMP WORKED WITH, SHE NOW

TRUMP WORKED WITH, SHE NOW ACCORDING TO THE TIMES, EXPECTS

ACCORDING TO THE TIMES, EXPECTS TO BE CALLED TOO PUBLICLY

TO BE CALLED TOO PUBLICLY TESTIFIED ON CAPITOL HILL.

TESTIFIED ON CAPITOL HILL. THATS ACCORDING TO PEOPLE

THATS ACCORDING TO PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH HER THINKING.

FAMILIAR WITH HER THINKING. SO WE WILL HAVE MORE ON THIS

SO WE WILL HAVE MORE ON THIS STORY LATER ON THIS HOUR.

STORY LATER ON THIS HOUR. THIS ONE DOES SEEM TO BE SORT OF

THIS ONE DOES SEEM TO BE SORT OF CRACKING OPEN.

CRACKING OPEN. THE DEUTSCHE BANK/TRUMP

THE DEUTSCHE BANK/TRUMP RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN SORT OF A

RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN SORT OF A FLASHING RED LIGHT FROM THE

FLASHING RED LIGHT FROM THE VERY, VERY BEGINNINGING, ALL OF

VERY, VERY BEGINNINGING, ALL OF THESE INVESTIGATES ALL REFERENCE

THESE INVESTIGATES ALL REFERENCE ILLY TURN INTO THE FOLLOW THE

ILLY TURN INTO THE FOLLOW THE MONEY INVESTIGATIONS.

MONEY INVESTIGATIONS. ALMOST ALL OF THE FOLLOW THE

ALMOST ALL OF THE FOLLOW THE MONEY INVESTIGATION SEEMED TO

MONEY INVESTIGATION SEEMED TO FIND THEIR WAY BACK TO DEUTSCHE

FIND THEIR WAY BACK TO DEUTSCHE BANK, AND THERES A OP ED AS

BANK, AND THERES A OP ED AS WELL A THIS.

WELL A THIS. BUT IN GENERAL, THIS ISNT THE

BUT IN GENERAL, THIS ISNT THE ONLY THING CHURNING.

ONLY THING CHURNING. IN GENERAL THE DAY IS TURNING

IN GENERAL THE DAY IS TURNING OUT TO BE A BUSY DAY ON THE LIE

OUT TO BE A BUSY DAY ON THE LIE DOWN WITH DOGS/GET UP WITH FLEAS

DOWN WITH DOGS/GET UP WITH FLEAS BEAT WHEN IT COMES TO THIS

BEAT WHEN IT COMES TO THIS ADMINISTRATION.

ADMINISTRATION. SOME OF THE STUFF IS STILL

SOME OF THE STUFF IS STILL SPINNING OUT FROM PAUL MANAFORT.

SPINNING OUT FROM PAUL MANAFORT. EVEN AS HES SLATED TO BEGINS

EVEN AS HES SLATED TO BEGINS HIS SEVEN-PLUS YEARS IN PRISON.

HIS SEVEN-PLUS YEARS IN PRISON. NOT ONLY IS MANAFORT FACING

NOT ONLY IS MANAFORT FACING STATE CHARGES IN ADDITION TO THE

STATE CHARGES IN ADDITION TO THE FEDERAL TIME, BUT WHEN IT COMES

FEDERAL TIME, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO OTHER THINGS DERIVING FROM

TO OTHER THINGS DERIVING FROM THE MANAFORT INVESTIGATION, THE

THE MANAFORT INVESTIGATION, THE BELL IS STARTING TO TOLL FOR

BELL IS STARTING TO TOLL FOR OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER ENTITIES

OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER ENTITIES WHO MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN

WHO MAY HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN SOME OF THE STUFF THAT MANAFORT

SOME OF THE STUFF THAT MANAFORT IS GOING TO JAIL FOR.

IS GOING TO JAIL FOR. THERE WAS A MOMENT IN HIS

THERE WAS A MOMENT IN HIS SENTENCING LAST WEEK WHEN, NOW

SENTENCING LAST WEEK WHEN, NOW LOOKING BACK AT IT, YOU COULD

LOOKING BACK AT IT, YOU COULD SEE THE JUDGE WHO SENTENCED HIM

SEE THE JUDGE WHO SENTENCED HIM WAS TEEING THIS UP PRETTY

WAS TEEING THIS UP PRETTY CLEARLY.

CLEARLY. I DIDNT FEEL UNTIL TODAY THAT I

I DIDNT FEEL UNTIL TODAY THAT I KNEW WHAT THE JUDGE WAS GETTING

KNEW WHAT THE JUDGE WAS GETTING AT WHEN THE JUDGE LAUNCHED INTO

AT WHEN THE JUDGE LAUNCHED INTO A TIRADE, BUT TODAYS NEWS MAKES

A TIRADE, BUT TODAYS NEWS MAKES IT PRETTY CLEAR.

IT PRETTY CLEAR. THIS ONE BIT FROM THE

THIS ONE BIT FROM THE TRANSCRIPT.

TRANSCRIPT. THIS IS WHEN MANAFORT WAS IN

THIS IS WHEN MANAFORT WAS IN COURT LAST WEEK BEFORE JUDGE AMY

COURT LAST WEEK BEFORE JUDGE AMY BERMAN-JACKSON, HIS SECOND

BERMAN-JACKSON, HIS SECOND FEDERAL SENTENCING LAST WEEK.

FEDERAL SENTENCING LAST WEEK. AT ONE POINT BEFORE SHE HANDS

AT ONE POINT BEFORE SHE HANDS DOWN THE SENTENCE AND SHES

DOWN THE SENTENCE AND SHES TALKING TO HIM ABOUT HIS CLIMBS

TALKING TO HIM ABOUT HIS CLIMBS AND THE SERIOUSNESS OF HIS

AND THE SERIOUSNESS OF HIS CRIMES, SHE SAYS THIS --

CRIMES, SHE SAYS THIS -- LOBBYING IS NOT ILLEGAL.

LOBBYING IS NOT ILLEGAL. BEING PAID TO DO IT EVEN ON

BEING PAID TO DO IT EVEN ON BEHALF OF ET CLIENTS WHO ORDERS

BEHALF OF ET CLIENTS WHO ORDERS MASSE SIGH ODIOUS IS NOT ILLEGAL

MASSE SIGH ODIOUS IS NOT ILLEGAL IF YOU FOLLOW THE LAWS THAT

IF YOU FOLLOW THE LAWS THAT GOVERNS FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS AND

GOVERNS FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS AND PAY THE TAXES, ITS NOT ILLEGAL.

PAY THE TAXES, ITS NOT ILLEGAL. ITS OKAY TO SAY MEMBERS OF THE

ITS OKAY TO SAY MEMBERS OF THE CONGRESS, THE GOVERNOR OF

CONGRESS, THE GOVERNOR OF UKRAINE WOULD LIKE YOU TO

UKRAINE WOULD LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING, AND WHEN

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING, AND WHEN YOU DETERMINE WHAT THE FOREIGN

YOU DETERMINE WHAT THE FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES

POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES SHOULD BE, BUT WHAT YOU WERE

SHOULD BE, BUT WHAT YOU WERE DOING, MR. MANAFORT, WAS LYING

DOING, MR. MANAFORT, WAS LYING TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE

TO MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, SAYING LOOK AT

AMERICAN PUBLIC, SAYING LOOK AT THIS NICE PR FIRM, LOOK AT THIS

THIS NICE PR FIRM, LOOK AT THIS NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM, LOOK

NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM, LOOK AT THEY PROMINENT HE OFFICIALS,

AT THEY PROMINENT HE OFFICIALS, HOW THEY HAVE STOOD UP FOR

HOW THEY HAVE STOOD UP FOR YANUKOVYCH AND THE NEW UKRAINE

YANUKOVYCH AND THE NEW UKRAINE ADMINISTRATION, WHEN ALL THE

ADMINISTRATION, WHEN ALL THE WHILE YOU AND THE UKRAINIANS

WHILE YOU AND THE UKRAINIANS ACTUALLY HAD THEM ON THE

ACTUALLY HAD THEM ON THE PAYROLL.

PAYROLL. THIS DELIBERATE EFFORT TO

THIS DELIBERATE EFFORT TO OBSCURE THE FACTS UNDERMINES OUR

OBSCURE THE FACTS UNDERMINES OUR POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND INFECTS

POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND INFECTS OR POLICYMAKING.

OR POLICYMAKING. IF THE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE THE

IF THE PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE THE FACTS, DEMOCRACY CANT WORK.

FACTS, DEMOCRACY CANT WORK. SO THATCHES THE JUDGE IN

SO THATCHES THE JUDGE IN MANAFORTS CASE JUST A FEW DAYS

MANAFORTS CASE JUST A FEW DAYS AGO, REAMING HIM OUT ABOUT THE

AGO, REAMING HIM OUT ABOUT THE SERIOUSNESS OF HIS CRIMES AND

SERIOUSNESS OF HIS CRIMES AND HOW WHAT HE DID WITH THIS

HOW WHAT HE DID WITH THIS ILLEGAL LOBBYING STUFF WAS NOT

ILLEGAL LOBBYING STUFF WAS NOT JUST A FAILURE TO COMPORT WITH

JUST A FAILURE TO COMPORT WITH PESKY REGULATIONS, BUT IT WAS

PESKY REGULATIONS, BUT IT WAS SERIOUS AND A DAMAGES THING FOR

SERIOUS AND A DAMAGES THING FOR OUR DEMOCRACY.

OUR DEMOCRACY. NOW IT SORT OF BECOMES EVEN MORE

NOW IT SORT OF BECOMES EVEN MORE CLEAR IN HINDSIGHT, BECAUSE THE

CLEAR IN HINDSIGHT, BECAUSE THE WAY SHES REAMING MANAFORT OUT

WAY SHES REAMING MANAFORT OUT THERE, YOU KNOW, WHAT SHE

THERE, YOU KNOW, WHAT SHE MOMENTS LATER SENDS HIM TO

MOMENTS LATER SENDS HIM TO PRISON FOR IS A TYPE OF CRIME

PRISON FOR IS A TYPE OF CRIME THAT MANAFORT DIDNT COMMIT

THAT MANAFORT DIDNT COMMIT ALONE, THAT DOES APPEAR TO HAVE

ALONE, THAT DOES APPEAR TO HAVE INVOLVED OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER

INVOLVED OTHER PEOPLE AND OTHER ENTITIES.

ENTITIES. THE QUESTION REMAINS AS TO

THE QUESTION REMAINS AS TO WHETHER THEYRE GOING TO GET IN

WHETHER THEYRE GOING TO GET IN TROUBLE TOO, JUST LIKE PAUL

TROUBLE TOO, JUST LIKE PAUL MANAFORT IS.

MANAFORT IS. THE JUDGE SAYS IN THAT TIRADE

THE JUDGE SAYS IN THAT TIRADE BEFORE THE SENTENCE, SHE SAYS

BEFORE THE SENTENCE, SHE SAYS THAT MANAFORTS CRIMINAL SCHEME

THAT MANAFORTS CRIMINAL SCHEME INVOLVED A NICE AMERICAN PR

INVOLVED A NICE AMERICAN PR FIRM, A NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM

FIRM, A NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM ON WHO ALL WERE SUPPOSEDLY

ON WHO ALL WERE SUPPOSEDLY STEPPING FORWARD TO MAKE A CASE

STEPPING FORWARD TO MAKE A CASE FOR MANAFORTS UKRAINIAN

FOR MANAFORTS UKRAINIAN CLIENTS.

CLIENTS. IN THIS SCHEME, IT WAS ACTUALLY

IN THIS SCHEME, IT WAS ACTUALLY TWO NICE AMERICAN PR FIRMS AND

TWO NICE AMERICAN PR FIRMS AND ONE NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM WHO

ONE NICE U.S.-BASED LAW FIRM WHO PARTICIPATED IN MANAFORTS

PARTICIPATED IN MANAFORTS CRIMES.

CRIMES. THE SPECIAL COUNSELS OFFICE HAS

THE SPECIAL COUNSELS OFFICE HAS REPORTEDLY LOOKED INTO BOTH OF

REPORTEDLY LOOKED INTO BOTH OF THE PR FIRMS AND INTO THE LAW

THE PR FIRMS AND INTO THE LAW FIRMS AND REPORTEDLY MADE A

FIRMS AND REPORTEDLY MADE A REFERRAL TO NORTHWESTERLY

REFERRAL TO NORTHWESTERLY PROSECUTORS IN NEW YORK FOR

PROSECUTORS IN NEW YORK FOR POTENTIALLY PROSECUTION OF THOSE

POTENTIALLY PROSECUTION OF THOSE FIRMS FOR THEIR ROLE IN WHAT

FIRMS FOR THEIR ROLE IN WHAT MANAFORT DID.

MANAFORT DID. ACCORDING TO ANOTHER STORY IN

ACCORDING TO ANOTHER STORY IN "NEW YORK TIMES" TODAY FROM KEN

"NEW YORK TIMES" TODAY FROM KEN VOGUELING AND KATY BENNER,

VOGUELING AND KATY BENNER, FEDERAL PROSECUTORS WERE ASKING

FEDERAL PROSECUTORS WERE ASKING WITNESSES QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE

WITNESSES QUESTIONS ABOUT THESE TWO PR FIRMS WHO WORKED WITH

TWO PR FIRMS WHO WORKED WITH MANAFORT AS RELY AS JANUARY OF

MANAFORT AS RELY AS JANUARY OF THIS YEAR.

THIS YEAR. WE DONT KNOW IF THEYRE GOING

WE DONT KNOW IF THEYRE GOING TO BE CHARGED, BUT WE KNOW

TO BE CHARGED, BUT WE KNOW PROSECUTORO ARES HAVE BEEN

PROSECUTORO ARES HAVE BEEN ACTIVE IN THEM, THE PR FIRMS.

ACTIVE IN THEM, THE PR FIRMS. THE LAW FIRM THAT WAS INVOLVED

THE LAW FIRM THAT WAS INVOLVED WITH MANAFORT IS A VERY RICH,

WITH MANAFORT IS A VERY RICH, VERY INFLUENTIAL LAW FIRM.

VERY INFLUENTIAL LAW FIRM. THEY INTERINTO NON-PROSECUTION

THEY INTERINTO NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT, IN WHICH THEY

AGREEMENT, IN WHICH THEY ADMITTED WRONGDOING AND AGREED

ADMITTED WRONGDOING AND AGREED TO PAY BACK MILLIONS IN

TO PAY BACK MILLIONS IN ILL-GOTTEN GAINS FROM THIS

ILL-GOTTEN GAINS FROM THIS CRIMINAL SCHEME THEY WERE

CRIMINAL SCHEME THEY WERE INVOLVED IN.

INVOLVED IN. BUT ITS A NON-PROSECUTION

BUT ITS A NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR PAYING

AGREEMENT IN EXCHANGE FOR PAYING ALL THAT MONEY, TO TRAIN THEIR

ALL THAT MONEY, TO TRAIN THEIR STAFF AND ADMIT WRONGDOING, THE

STAFF AND ADMIT WRONGDOING, THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAID THEY

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SAID THEY WOULD NOT PROSECUTOR THEM.

WOULD NOT PROSECUTOR THEM. BUT THE LEAD PARTNER FROM THAT

BUT THE LEAD PARTNER FROM THAT LAW FIRM WHO WORKED ON THIS

LAW FIRM WHO WORKED ON THIS CASE, THE GUY WHO WORKED ON THIS

CASE, THE GUY WHO WORKED ON THIS SCHEME, FOR WHICH MANAFORT IS

SCHEME, FOR WHICH MANAFORT IS GOING TO PRISON AND FOR WHICH

GOING TO PRISON AND FOR WHICH THE LAW FIRM HE USED TO WORK

THE LAW FIRM HE USED TO WORK WITH HAD TO ENTER INTO AN

WITH HAD TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT.

AGREEMENT. THAT LEAD PARTNER HIMSELF ISNT

THAT LEAD PARTNER HIMSELF ISNT COVERED BY THE NONPROSECUTION

COVERED BY THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT, BECAUSE HE LEFT THE

AGREEMENT, BECAUSE HE LEFT THE FIRM LAST YEAR, AND HES NOW OUT

FIRM LAST YEAR, AND HES NOW OUT THERE A HIS OWN.

THERE A HIS OWN. HE WOULD BE A VERY UNUSUAL FISH

HE WOULD BE A VERY UNUSUAL FISH TORE CAUGHT IN THIS NET OF

TORE CAUGHT IN THIS NET OF SCANDAL SURROUNDING THIS

SCANDAL SURROUNDING THIS PRESIDENT AND THIS

PRESIDENT AND THIS ADMINISTRATION AND THIS

ADMINISTRATION AND THIS PRESIDENTS CAMPAIGN, BECAUSE

PRESIDENTS CAMPAIGN, BECAUSE THAT LAWYER WHOS NOW OUT ON HIS

THAT LAWYER WHOS NOW OUT ON HIS OWN ON THIS, HIS NAME IS GREGORY

OWN ON THIS, HIS NAME IS GREGORY CRAIG.

CRAIG. HE IS A DEMOCRAT, HE WAS THE

HE IS A DEMOCRAT, HE WAS THE FIRST WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL UNDER

FIRST WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA DURING PRESIDENT

PRESIDENT OBAMA DURING PRESIDENT OBAMAS FIRST YEAR IN OFFICE IN

OBAMAS FIRST YEAR IN OFFICE IN 2009.

2009. AFTER MUELLER REFERRED THESE

AFTER MUELLER REFERRED THESE CASES AGAINST THE PR FIRM PO FOR

CASES AGAINST THE PR FIRM PO FOR POTENTIAL PROSECUTION, THE "NEW

POTENTIAL PROSECUTION, THE "NEW YORK TIMES" REPORTS TODAY THAT

YORK TIMES" REPORTS TODAY THAT THE CASE INVOLVING THE LAWYER,

THE CASE INVOLVING THE LAWYER, GREGORY CRAIG, IT GOT

GREGORY CRAIG, IT GOT TRANSFERRED IN JANUARY FROM

TRANSFERRED IN JANUARY FROM FEDERAL PROSECUTORS IN NEW YORK

FEDERAL PROSECUTORS IN NEW YORK TO PROSECUTORS IN WASHINGTON.

TO PROSECUTORS IN WASHINGTON. SO IT ALL STARTS WITH MUELLER,

SO IT ALL STARTS WITH MUELLER, MUELLER REFERS IT FOR POTENTIAL

MUELLER REFERS IT FOR POTENTIAL PROSECUTION ON SDNY, SDNY KEEPS

PROSECUTION ON SDNY, SDNY KEEPS THE POTENTIAL FOR PROSECUTION,

THE POTENTIAL FOR PROSECUTION, THEY -- JUSTICE DEPARTMENT

THEY -- JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ENTERS INTO A AGREEMENT WITH THE

ENTERS INTO A AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW FIRM, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO

LAW FIRM, BUT WHEN IT COMES TO GREGORY CRAIG, OBAMAS FORMER

GREGORY CRAIG, OBAMAS FORMER WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL, THAT

WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL, THAT APPARENTLY HAS BEEN HANDED TO

APPARENTLY HAS BEEN HANDED TO OTHER PROSECUTORS IN WASHINGTON.

OTHER PROSECUTORS IN WASHINGTON. I DONT KNOW IF THATS THE U.S.

I DONT KNOW IF THATS THE U.S. ATTORNEY

ATTORNEY ATTORNEYS OFFICE IN D.C. OR

ATTORNEYS OFFICE IN D.C. OR POTENTIALLY PROSECUTORS WORKING

POTENTIALLY PROSECUTORS WORKING OUT MAIN JUSTICE, BUT ACCORDING

OUT MAIN JUSTICE, BUT ACCORDING TO PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE

TO PEOPLE FAMILIAR WITH THE CAME, THE TIMES REPORTS TONIGHT

CAME, THE TIMES REPORTS TONIGHT THAT PROSECUTORS ARE MOVING

THAT PROSECUTORS ARE MOVING QUICKLY TOWARD A DECISION ABOUT

QUICKLY TOWARD A DECISION ABOUT AN INDICTMENT OF GREGORY CRAIG.

AN INDICTMENT OF GREGORY CRAIG. QUOTE, A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER

QUOTE, A DECISION ABOUT WHETHER TO PROSECUTOR MR. CRAIG IS A

TO PROSECUTOR MR. CRAIG IS A EXPECTED IN COMING WEEKS.

EXPECTED IN COMING WEEKS. AND ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT,

AND ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, PROPUBLICA REPORTED THEY

PROPUBLICA REPORTED THEY UNCOVERED A SEALED -- AGAINST

UNCOVERED A SEALED -- AGAINST BRODY, BROIDY, ACCORDING TO THE

BRODY, BROIDY, ACCORDING TO THE SURGE WARRANT, IT SHOWED THAT

SURGE WARRANT, IT SHOWED THAT FEDERAL AUTHORITIES EXECUTED A

FEDERAL AUTHORITIES EXECUTED A RATE ON ELLIOTT BROIDYS OFFICE.

RATE ON ELLIOTT BROIDYS OFFICE. IT TURNS OUT HE HAD HIS OFFICE

IT TURNS OUT HE HAD HIS OFFICE RAIDED JUST A FEW WEEKS LATER.

RAIDED JUST A FEW WEEKS LATER. AGENTS WERE AUTHORIZED TO USE

AGENTS WERE AUTHORIZED TO USE BROIDYS HANDS AND FACE TO

BROIDYS HANDS AND FACE TO UNLOCK ANY PHONES THAT REQUIRED

UNLOCK ANY PHONES THAT REQUIRED FINGERPRINT OR FACIAL SCANS.

FINGERPRINT OR FACIAL SCANS. HOW DOES THAT EVEN WORK?

HOW DOES THAT EVEN WORK? SIR, WILL YOU USE THIS FACE TO

SIR, WILL YOU USE THIS FACE TO UNLOCK THIS PHONE?

UNLOCK THIS PHONE? NO, I WILL NOT.

NO, I WILL NOT. >> SIR, WE HAVE A COURT ORDER TO

>> SIR, WE HAVE A COURT ORDER TO ALLOW US TO USE YOUR FACE.

ALLOW US TO USE YOUR FACE. YOU CANT USE MY FACE.

YOU CANT USE MY FACE. >> SIR, WERE USES YOUR FACE.

>> SIR, WERE USES YOUR FACE. >> I MEAN, HOW DOES THAT -- THE

>> I MEAN, HOW DOES THAT -- THE SEARCH WARRANT ALSO REPORTEDLY

SEARCH WARRANT ALSO REPORTEDLY CITED THREE POTENTIAL CRIMES

CITED THREE POTENTIAL CRIMES THAT AUTHORITIES WERE

THAT AUTHORITIES WERE INVESTIGATING -- CONSPIRACY,

INVESTIGATING -- CONSPIRACY, MONTH LAUNDERING AND VIOLATIONS

MONTH LAUNDERING AND VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW BARRING COVERT

OF THE LAW BARRING COVERT LOBBYING.

LOBBYING. LIKE PAUL MANAFORT.

LIKE PAUL MANAFORT. ACCORDING TO PROPUBLICA TODAY,

ACCORDING TO PROPUBLICA TODAY, IT THOR ICED FEDERAL AGENTS TO

IT THOR ICED FEDERAL AGENTS TO SEIZE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO A

SEIZE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT FOREIGN

BUNCH OF DIFFERENT FOREIGN COUNTRIES, INCLUDING MALAYSIA,

COUNTRIES, INCLUDING MALAYSIA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, QATAR AND

UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, QATAR AND SAUDI ARABIA, AND THEY SHOULD

SAUDI ARABIA, AND THEY SHOULD ALSO HE ALLOWED TO RECEIVE

ALSO HE ALLOWED TO RECEIVE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO GEORGE

DOCUMENTS RELATED TO GEORGE NADER.

NADER. HES THE FIRST PERSON REPORTED

HES THE FIRST PERSON REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY IN

TO HAVE BEEN GRANTED IMMUNITY IN EXCHANGE FOR HIS HELP TO

EXCHANGE FOR HIS HELP TO MUELLER.

MUELLER. AGENTS WERE ALSO ALLOWED TO SEES

AGENTS WERE ALSO ALLOWED TO SEES MATERIAL RELATED TO RICK GATES.

MATERIAL RELATED TO RICK GATES. PRESIDENT TRUMPS DEPUTY

PRESIDENT TRUMPS DEPUTY CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN.

CAMPAIGN CHAIRMAN. HE OF COURSE IS ALSO COOPERATING

HE OF COURSE IS ALSO COOPERATING WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSELS

WITH THE SPECIAL COUNSELS OFFICE.

OFFICE. HIS COOPERATION DEAL WAS JUST

HIS COOPERATION DEAL WAS JUST EXTENDED ON FRIDAY FOR ANOTHER

EXTENDED ON FRIDAY FOR ANOTHER TWO MONTHS, BECAUSE PROSECUTORS

TWO MONTHS, BECAUSE PROSECUTORS SAY THEY ARE STILL WORKING WITH

SAY THEY ARE STILL WORKING WITH GATES, THEY ARE STILL EXTRACTING

GATES, THEY ARE STILL EXTRACTING MORE COOPERATION THATS HELPING

MORE COOPERATION THATS HELPING WITH MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS.

WITH MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS. EVEN THOUGH NOW IT IS MORE THAN

EVEN THOUGH NOW IT IS MORE THAN A YEAR SINCE HE STARTED

A YEAR SINCE HE STARTED COOPERATING.

COOPERATING. SO WERE USED TO THINKING ABOUT

SO WERE USED TO THINKING ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE CAUGHT UP IN THE

PEOPLE WHO ARE CAUGHT UP IN THE MESS SURROUNDING THIS PRESIDENT

MESS SURROUNDING THIS PRESIDENT AND THIS ADMINISTRATION -- I DO

AND THIS ADMINISTRATION -- I DO NOT MEAN THIS TO BE RUDE, AND I

NOT MEAN THIS TO BE RUDE, AND I DONT MEAN THIS IN A PERSONALLY

DONT MEAN THIS IN A PERSONALLY MINIMIZING WAY, BUT WERE SORT

MINIMIZING WAY, BUT WERE SORT OF USED TO THINKING THE PEOPLE

OF USED TO THINKING THE PEOPLE CAUGHT UP IN THIS MISH I GOSH AS

CAUGHT UP IN THIS MISH I GOSH AS SORT OF TRUMP-WORLD CHARACTERS?

SORT OF TRUMP-WORLD CHARACTERS? IS THAT A FAIRWAY TO SAY IT

PEOPLE WHO COULD ONLY EXIST IN

PEOPLE WHO COULD ONLY EXIST IN HIS ORBIT, PEOPLE WHO OTHERWISE

HIS ORBIT, PEOPLE WHO OTHERWISE WOULD NEVER BE NATIONAL NEWS

WOULD NEVER BE NATIONAL NEWS WERE IT NOT FOR DONALD TRUMP AND

WERE IT NOT FOR DONALD TRUMP AND HIS UNLIKELY RISE TO THE

HIS UNLIKELY RISE TO THE PRESIDENCY.

PRESIDENCY. LIKE PEOPLE LIKE ALLEN

LIKE PEOPLE LIKE ALLEN WEISSELBERG, AN ACCOUNTANT WHO

WEISSELBERG, AN ACCOUNTANT WHO ENDED UP BEING A CENTRAL, OR

ENDED UP BEING A CENTRAL, OR MICHAEL COHEN, A TAXI MEDALLION

MICHAEL COHEN, A TAXI MEDALLION GUY, WHO WAS NEED RATTLY

GUY, WHO WAS NEED RATTLY REPORTING INCOME, AND ALL THESE

REPORTING INCOME, AND ALL THESE PEOPLE WHO ARRIVED IN TRUMPS

PEOPLE WHO ARRIVED IN TRUMPS CLOWN CAR WITH HIM, BUT NOW ITS

CLOWN CAR WITH HIM, BUT NOW ITS NO LONGER A CONTAINED EPIDEMIC.

NO LONGER A CONTAINED EPIDEMIC. NOW NOW THE EXPOSER IS WIDER

NOW NOW THE EXPOSER IS WIDER SPREAD.

SPREAD. HERES DEUTSCHE BANK, THIS BANK

HERES DEUTSCHE BANK, THIS BANK WITH A REN STATION FOR RUSSIAN

WITH A REN STATION FOR RUSSIAN MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCIAL

MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCIAL MISCONDUCT.

MISCONDUCT. NOW DEUTSCHE BANKS MOST TRUMP

NOW DEUTSCHE BANKS MOST TRUMP ADJACENT EXECUTIVE EXPECTED TO

ADJACENT EXECUTIVE EXPECTED TO PUBLICLY TESTIFY IN CONGRESS.

PUBLICLY TESTIFY IN CONGRESS. THE BANK IS FIELDING SUBPOENAS

THE BANK IS FIELDING SUBPOENAS FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES.

FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT ENTITIES. THE INSURANCE GIANT AEON,

THE INSURANCE GIANT AEON, EVENING AS THEY LONGTIME

EVENING AS THEY LONGTIME PERSONAL LAWYER SAYS HE WAS

PERSONAL LAWYER SAYS HE WAS COMMITTING INSURANCE FRAUD.

COMMITTING INSURANCE FRAUD. THEY TOO ARE FACING SUBPOENA.

THEY TOO ARE FACING SUBPOENA. A MAJOR LAW FIRM HAS ENTERED

A MAJOR LAW FIRM HAS ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE

INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT HIS

JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ABOUT HIS PARTICIPATION.

PARTICIPATION. A SENIOR OBAMA WHITE HOUSE

A SENIOR OBAMA WHITE HOUSE OFFICIAL, WILL KNOW WHETHER HE

OFFICIAL, WILL KNOW WHETHER HE HIMSELF IS BEING CRIMINALLY

HIMSELF IS BEING CRIMINALLY CHARGED FOR HIS A LITTLED

CHARGED FOR HIS A LITTLED INVOLVEMENT.

INVOLVEMENT. TWO MAJOR RICH AND INFLUENTIAL

TWO MAJOR RICH AND INFLUENTIAL PR FIRMS ARE FACING THE SAME

PR FIRMS ARE FACING THE SAME PROSPECTS.

PROSPECTS. ONE OF THOSE FIRMS HAS ALREADY

ONE OF THOSE FIRMS HAS ALREADY DISSOLVED UNTIL THE PRESSURE

DISSOLVED UNTIL THE PRESSURE THAT ALL THIS SCRUTINY HAS

THAT ALL THIS SCRUTINY HAS BROUGHT.

BROUGHT. EVEN THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL

EVEN THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, RIGHT?

COMMITTEE, RIGHT? THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY AS

THE NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY AS AN INSTITUTION, THEY CHOSE A NEW

AN INSTITUTION, THEY CHOSE A NEW FINANCIAL CHAIR AND TWO DEPUTIES

FINANCIAL CHAIR AND TWO DEPUTIES TO SERVE THEM IN THE TRUMP ERA.

TO SERVE THEM IN THE TRUMP ERA. ALL THREE HAVE HAD TO STEP DOWN

ALL THREE HAVE HAD TO STEP DOWN FROM THEIR POSTS.

FROM THEIR POSTS. ONE IS ON HIS WAY TO PRISON MUCH

ONE IS ON HIS WAY TO PRISON MUCH ONE WAS SUBPOENAED ABOUT THE

ONE WAS SUBPOENAED ABOUT THE OTHER ONE, WHO WE LEARNED TODAY

OTHER ONE, WHO WE LEARNED TODAY WAS ALSO RAIDED BY THE FBI LAST

WAS ALSO RAIDED BY THE FBI LAST SUMMER.

SUMMER. AND NOW TONIGHT ITS TIME TO

AND NOW TONIGHT ITS TIME TO HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH JERRY

HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH JERRY NADLER OF NEW YORK, BECAUSE ON

NADLER OF NEW YORK, BECAUSE ON TOP OF ALL OF THOSE PROCEEDINGS

TOP OF ALL OF THOSE PROCEEDINGS IN THIS PRESIDENTS ORBIT, IN

IN THIS PRESIDENTS ORBIT, IN THE LEGAL ARENA, YOU KNOW,

THE LEGAL ARENA, YOU KNOW, CHAIRMAN NADLER SAYS TODAY THAT

CHAIRMAN NADLER SAYS TODAY THAT IN ADDITION TO ALL THAT STUFF

IN ADDITION TO ALL THAT STUFF GOING ON IN COURTROOMS AND IN

GOING ON IN COURTROOMS AND IN PROSECUTORSS OFFICES AROUND THE

PROSECUTORSS OFFICES AROUND THE COUNTRY, CHAIRMAN NADLER SAYS

COUNTRY, CHAIRMAN NADLER SAYS TODAY, IN RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE

TODAY, IN RESPONSE TO MULTIPLE KOUMT QUESTIONS SENT OUT, HE

KOUMT QUESTIONS SENT OUT, HE SAYS TONIGHT THAT HE HAS ALREADY

SAYS TONIGHT THAT HE HAS ALREADY OBTAINED TENS OF THOUSANDS OF

OBTAINED TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PAGES OF DOCUMENTS FOR HIS

PAGES OF DOCUMENTS FOR HIS COMMITTEES MULTIPLE

COMMITTEES MULTIPLE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT

INVESTIGATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT AND HIS CAMPAIGN AND HIS

AND HIS CAMPAIGN AND HIS ADMINISTRATION.

ADMINISTRATION. INCLUDING THOUSANDS OF PAGES

The Description of Investigations Multiply As President Donald Trump Scandals Spiral Wider | Rachel Maddow | MSNBC