The Prime Minister wants to talk about
politicians who have lead Canadians in error.
This Prime Minister said when the allegation were
first printed in the Globe and Mail, that they were
completely false. We now know that is not true.
Is the Prime Minister aware that if he says something
that he knows not to be true,
in a court proceeding that he will be guilty of perjury?
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
Mr. Speaker, we have seen the Conservatives
time and time again mislead Canadians,
and they are smarting that we actually
called them out on it. We put them on notice
because, indeed, they continue,
particularly in this election year,
to spread falsehoods to Canadians.
Just recently, they actually sent a Householder
to Canadians that was not telling them about
our climate action incentive, which
returns hundreds of dollars to Canadians
that they have to claim through their taxes.
They have no plan on the environment.
All they do is mislead Canadians.
All they do is mislead Canadians about our plan
to fight climate change.
Order.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister now wants
to talk about falsehoods.
The Prime Minister said, in response
to The Globe and Mail story breaking
the SNC-Lavalin corruption scandal,
that no one, neither himself nor anyone
in his office, put pressure
on the former Attorney General to interfere in this case.
We now know that that is completely false.
So, once again, is the Prime Minister aware
that if he says something that he knows
not to be true in a court case
that he will be guilty of perjury?
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
I think what Canadians are remarking upon
is the fact that the Conservatives actually
don't want to talk about anything
that actually matters to Canadians
in their day-to-day lives. Canadians are worried
about the threat of climate change
and the impact on their kids.
And Conservatives have no plan,
are misleading people about our plan,
and don't want to talk about it
and they try to change the subject.
What's worse: They have no plan for the economy.
They continue to want to raise ta- lower taxes
on the wealthiest Canadians,
when what we know is to invest in the
middle class is to grow the economy.
No plan on the economy. No plan on the environment.
Order.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
Order.
Mr. Speaker, I would just remind the Prime Minister
that it was his idea to bring these allegations to court.
I'm just waiting for him to tell me
on what day I should show up,
because I'll be there.
Now if he wants to talk about falsehoods,
he told Canadians and looked them in the eyes,
he said that the former Attorney General
or anyone else never came to him
to raise concerns about being pressured
to interfere in this case.
We now know that that is false.
Is the Prime Minister aware that if he said
that in a court case at this point
that he would be guilty of perjury?
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
Mr. Speaker, once again the Opposition Leader
is doubling down on his false and misleading statements.
We put him on notice because he has a history,
and his party has a history, of misleading Canadians.
That's exactly what they did when
he had to withdraw and retract
misleading statements he'd made
about the Minister of Innovation
just a few months ago.
We know Mr. Speaker, that
their way is to try and mislead Canadians
as much as they possibly can. We need to call
them out on that because falsehoods have
no place in an election campaign.
The Honourable - Order.
Order.
Order.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister says that he's
put me on notice, hoping that I'll withdraw my statements.
I'm not. I repeated them again outside.
So, I'm putting him on notice
that I'm looking forward to the day
that he sets for this court case to proceed.
But, when it comes to falsehoods,
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has stated that
his excuse for interfering in this court case
was because of jobs. We now know
that this isn't true either.
So, once again, is the Prime Minister aware of
the criminal penalties for committing
perjury in a court case?
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
Mr. Speaker, I can understand the member opposite's
frustration. His economic plan is in
shambles after ten years of the lowest growth rate,
since the Great Depression, under Stephen Harper.
We turned that around with an approach
that invests in Canadians and therefore
Canadians created over 900,000
new jobs over the past three years.
We've seen the lowest unemployment in 40 years.
Our plan is working, and yes,
Mr. Speaker, we will always fight
for jobs and we will never apologize
for fighting for jobs.
Order.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister wants to talk
about false statements. The Prime Minister said
that his motivation for interfering
in this criminal court case was because he
was afraid that SNC-Lavalin would move their
headquarters out of the country.
The head of SNC-Lavalin has said
that that this is completely false.
So, once again, is the Prime Minister aware
of the criminal penalties that he
would face if he said that falsehood
under oath in a court of law?
The Right Honourable Prime Minister.
Again, Mr. Speaker, we are unequivocal
about standing up for jobs, and
indeed, shortly after the head of SNC-Lavalin
made those comments, the company came out
and corrected the comments he had made.
We have been consistent in standing up for jobs.
We will continue to defend workers right across the country,
whether it's our steel and aluminum workers
whether it's our forestry workers,
whether it's in manufacturing.
We know that investing in Canadians,
investing in their communities is way better
than the cuts and austerity proposed by the Conservatives.
Order.
The Honourable Leader of the Opposition.
The Prime Minister just said another
false statement, Mr. Speaker. A spokesperson
for SNC-Lavalin said as late as last week
that there is no intention on moving the headquarters from Canada.
But I guess the Prime Minister is worried about
actually taking this to court, because everything
he has said outside this House,
in front of Canadians, if he were to say them again
in a court of law, he would be guilty of perjury.
I guess his famous “just watch me”
has turned into a “just watch me run away.”
Will he have the backbone to stand
by his threats and show up in court to fight this case?
Right Honourable Prime Minister.
Mr. Speaker, what we have here is a Conservative Party
flailing and floundering, trying to change
the subject away from what matters to Canadians.
They have no plan to fight climate change,
no plan on the economy, and, quite frankly,
have continued to demonstrate despite the rejection
they got from Canadians in 2015,
they still don't understand that the economy
and the environment need to go to together
and to build a stronger economy,
you have to take action on fighting climate change.
They fail to understand that, and therefore,
they're looking for anything else to talk about.