Practice English Speaking&Listening with: Rand Paul interview with Chris Williams

Normal
(0)
Difficulty: 0

POLITICAL

POLITICAL EDITOR

POLITICAL EDITOR CHRIS

POLITICAL EDITOR CHRIS WILLIAMS

POLITICAL EDITOR CHRIS WILLIAMS INTERVIEWED

POLITICAL EDITOR CHRIS WILLIAMS INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY

POLITICAL EDITOR CHRIS WILLIAMS INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL TODAY

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL TODAY -

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS

INTERVIEWED KENTUCKY SENATOR4@ RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY

RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY

RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY DEFENDED

RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE

RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT

RAND PAUL TODAY - WHO HAS PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED IF

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE

PUBLICLY DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS

DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS

DEFENDED THE PRESIDENT OFTEN.4@ AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS "IMPARTIAL"

AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS "IMPARTIAL"

AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS "IMPARTIAL" DURING4@

AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS "IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE

AFTER BEING ASKED IF HE WAS "IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL...

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL...

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED BY

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED BY SAYING

"IMPARTIAL" DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS

DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS

DURING4@ THE TRIAL... HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@ NEVER

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE ANY

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE ANY SENSE

HE RESPONDED BY SAYING THIS TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY.

TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY.

TRIAL4@ NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. >

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. >

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT IRONY

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT IRONY OF

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF

NEVER MADE ANY SENSE ANYWAY. > THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS

> THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS

> THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS

> THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS -

> THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE THE

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF

THE GREAT IRONY OF ALL OF THIS IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING

IS - THEY4@ ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING GOVERNMENT

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING GOVERNMENT TO

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING GOVERNMENT TO GO

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER

ACCUSE THE PRESIDENT OF ABUSEING GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT.

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE? THEY'VE

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER A POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED

POLITICAL OPPONENT. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED GOVERNMENT

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED GOVERNMENT TO

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED GOVERNMENT TO GO

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER

THEY DONE? THEY'VE SIMPLY ABUSED GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENT.

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF

GOVERNMENT TO GO AFTER THEIR POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR ARGUEMENT

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID -

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - '

POLITICAL OPPONENT. 4@ONE OF THM IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD TO

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD TO GET

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD TO GET THIS

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD TO GET THIS DONE

IN THEIR ARGUEMENT SAID - ' WELL WE HAD TO GET THIS DONE BECAUSE

WE HAD TO GET THIS DONE BECAUSE

IT'S

IT'S AN

IT'S AN ELECTION

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR -

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE WERE

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE WERE IN

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE WERE IN A

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE WERE IN A BIG

IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR - WE WERE IN A BIG HURRY'.

IN A BIG HURRY'.

IN A BIG HURRY'. 4@

4@

4@ 4@

4@ 4@ PAUL

4@ 4@ PAUL ALSO

4@ 4@ PAUL ALSO SAID

4@ 4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT

4@ 4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE

4@ 4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON

4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON

4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE

4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM

4@ PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON

PAUL ALSO SAID THAT PEOPLE ON REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE

REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE

REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL

REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SCHIFF'S4@ TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY

TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY

TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE

TEAM AND OTHER PEOPLE ON THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT

NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2-

COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2-

COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO

COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO -

COUNCIL WERE REPORTEDLY4@ DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF

DISCUSSING IMPEACHMENT 2- YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE

YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE

YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER

YEARS-AGO - SUGGESTING CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE.

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE.

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK

CONSPIRACY AND ABUSE OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK -

WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK -

WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL

WHISTLEBLOWER ROLE. YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS

YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS

YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS CRITICIZED

YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY

YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS

YOU MAY REMEMBER LAST WEEK - PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@

PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@

PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING

PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING THE

PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER

PAUL WAS CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO

CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO

CRITICIZED BY DEMOCRATS FOR4@ NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS.

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS.

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN

NAMING THE WHISTLEBLOWER TO REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE NAME

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE NAME OF

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE NAME OF THE

REPORTERS. PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE NAME OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.4@

PAUL SAYS HE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW4@ THE NAME OF THE WHISTLEBLOWER.4@

The Description of Rand Paul interview with Chris Williams