breaking news turns out the blast radius
from at eleven eleven-year-old sex
scandal can still prove lethal if you're
the labor secretary Alex Acosta who
prior to serving in Donald Trump's
cabinet served as the top prosecutor in
Miami out today but for his role in
negotiating a sweetheart deal for
accused pedophile and sex trafficker
Jeffrey Epstein as the scandal dragged
into its fifth day Donald Trump bid
Acosta farewell on the South Lawn with a
sorry not sorry to see you go Alex I
think you'll agree I said you don't have
to do this he doesn't have to do that he
made a deal that people are happy with
and then 12 years later they're not
happy with it you'll have to figure all
of that out but the fact is he has been
a fantastic Secretary of Labor Trunk
known to be consumed by media coverage
of his administration was clearly not
distraught about the deal that Acosta
negotiated for Epstein but concerned
about the bad press Acosta was getting
from the Washington Post quote Trump did
not originally want to be seen as
cutting ties with him over a decade old
episode even as some of his longest
advisors believed a Kostas departure was
inevitable given the cascade of
sustained news coverage and the facts of
the case with Acosta out of the picture
Trump is still trying to put distance
between himself and Epstein I was not a
fan of Jeffrey Epstein and you watched
people yesterday saying that I threw him
out of a club I didn't want anything to
do with him that was many many years ago
it shows you one thing that I have good
taste
okay now other people they went all over
with him they went to his Island they
went all over the place he was very well
known in Palm Beach but
Jeffrey Epstein was not somebody that I
respected I'd rule him out in fact I
think the great James Patterson was a
member of merrill ago made his statement
yesterday that many years ago I threw
him out I'm not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein
the pedophile the prosecutor and the
president that is where we start today
with some of our favorite reporters and
friends former US Attorney Joyce Vance
White House reporter for The Washington
Post
Ashley Parker with us at the table
former Assistant Director for
counterintelligence at the FBI Frank
ffunny Crean John Pierce Bakshi's senior
adviser to moveon.org and executive
editor for Bloomberg opinion Tim O'Brien
is here I want to start with you joyce
vans and just this this this this leap
into a parallel universe we're on the
day that it is unsustainable for the
Labor Secretary to continue to serve in
the Trump administration no one uh ters
the word victim no one says a word about
a miscarriage of justice all they say is
read the James Patterson fictionalized
version of this sex scandal I never
liked him
and I didn't make a cause to go what
where have we what is happening Joyce
Trump just doesn't seem to understand
that justice isn't just another deal and
this is so hard I think to watch as a
prosecutor knowing that when you enter
into a plea agreement in a case you have
equities that you have to be aware of
you have a community you have victims
you have the courts and you're trying to
do the right thing you're not just
delivering a deal the president
apparently views this as purely
transactional it's an old deal without
any concern for the victims that were
left behind when this happened and the
notion that Acosta is leaving without
any conversation about the victims and
about what this means for women in the
era of me too is I just think tone-deaf
completely it's turned of and for Acosta
to walk out the door without cleaning up
any of the damage to his own reputation
Frank
stunning to me as a former person who
handled communications for high-level
government officials to not stand there
and say I did my best but I'm sorry that
I presided over a system that failed
these young victims these weren't women
these were girls these were children
some of their lives were ruined some of
them are dead I mean to not I mean we
cover the dehumanization of migrants at
the border we cover the flippant way
Donald Trump talks about dictators but
we don't have a lot of tangible examples
of people actually being dehumanized in
real time the treatment of this case of
the Epstein victims has been the
dehumanization of girls and women in
real time we're living in an era where
children are being detained and inhumane
conditions by this administration so why
would we expect any kind of remorse or
apology from Acosta or from Trump and
you know let's be clear here Acosta
leaving is not because of any moral
outrage from this president correct it's
it's clearly because he's reading the
tea leaves and he understands more than
we probably give him credit for where
this is going public corruption
investigators are tearing apart the US
Attorney's handling of this in Miami and
this isn't going to get better it's
going to get more and more ugly for
Acosta and likely his staff at the time
in Miami and this image of a cost is
standing for half an hour on the White
House lawn next to Trump is going to
come back to haunt them during the 20/20
campaign well let me press you on that
what does that investigation look like
I'm gonna tell you what it looks like it
looks like interviews of all the AUSA s
and FBI agents in South Florida who
handled this case the police officers
who interacted with those agents and
prosecutors and they're gonna figure out
what was the phone activity who was
dangled money cash jobs by Epstein
and/or his cutouts and where are these
people today who objected to the deal in
the US Attorney's Office and was that
documented or not I see Parker your
colleague Bob Costas said something on
this program on one
day that sort of said to chill up my
spine he said that what every journalist
in the country worth his or her salt is
pursuing is the answer to what was
Trump's knowledge what was Trump's
knowledge of Geoffrey Epstein's conduct
I haven't seen that reported out
anywhere but I wonder your theory of
that case well we know just from that
one comment that has gotten some
attention I believe it was to New York
magazine in 2002 that the president had
at least some general awareness there's
that quote where he praises Jeffrey
Epstein as a great guy and sort of says
something along the lines of and I'm not
that's not verbatim but something lines
up like me he enjoys beautiful women his
often a lot younger so this was an open
secret in the circles that Jeffrey
Epstein ran in the circles that the
president traveled and it was something
that the president sort of spoke openly
about again we don't know if we if he
knew that Jeffrey Epstein was reaping
and abusing young girls but he was
certainly aware that Jeffrey Epstein was
often surrounded by very young women Tim
O'Brien let me put up those headlines
that actually just reference Trump
called Epstein a terrific guy who
enjoyed younger women before denying a
relationship with them so he was close
enough to know what kind of women he
surrounded himself with Jeffrey Epstein
was a terrific guy from the New York
Times Donald Trump once said now he's
not a fan that story I believe
chronicled a party where women were
flown in and the only two men in
attendance were Jeffrey Epstein
twenty-eight women I think every Epstein
and Donald Trump and Vanity Fair just
him and Epstein and 28 girls sort of man
drops a dime on Trump so when the
president stands on a White House lawn
and says he barely knew Jeffrey Epstein
that is just not supported by the fact
pattern they knew each other well from
1987 to at least 2002 he traveled on
Epstein's jet at least once I've seen
was either a member at mar-a-lago in
name or in substance but he was there
all the time and the president wanted
him to be there I you know I spent about
two years of a lot of time with Trump in
the mid-2000s he routinely talked about
Jeffrey Epstein as so many he had
mired he felt that they were in sync
mire bottom he liked that he was free to
pursue women whenever he wanted to he
liked that he had a lot of money to
spend in any way he wanted to he liked
that he was someone who I think didn't
care about the law or civility or women
being targets because I think that's
frankly the way the president approaches
the world you know at one point when I
was working on the book about him he
took me on the Upper East Side he had
just bought the rights to the Miss
America pageant and we went up there and
it's you know the one of the main things
I'm really excited about owning this
pageant is that I can introduce I can
introduce these girls to Eric to his son
Eric and we went into the you know into
the offices of the pageant and and it
was just it was a very uncomfortable
environment with him around these women
because I think his sole reason for
buying the pageant it was not a business
issue it was an access to women decision
in some of the court papers that have
come out Jeffrey Epstein said he wanted
to buy a modeling agency
because he wanted to use a modeling
agency in the same way the president
about the time the same way Donald Trump
used his modeling agency again access to
women so there's a lot of similarities
and how these two men approached the
world and it is not credible the
President had didn't having a close
relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and
they were worried about it up until
Election Day I you know shortly before
the election Michael Kohn and David
Packard the National Enquirer were
having discussions about whether or not
questions would come up about Jeffrey
Epstein's island and who had visited the
island so it was clearly front of mind
for them at least until Election Day you
know and I think it's important to be
careful every journalist has been on the
show every lawyer that's been on this
show has been careful but Donald Trump
is credibly accused of sexual deviance
and misconduct ranging from rape from eg
and Carol just a couple weeks ago to
misconduct two things that don't fall
under a criminal umbrella but there are
examples of him walking behind stage at
the Miss America pageant scrutinizing
their naked bodies of young women so I
guess my question that they're also
they're also was you know the way during
the election a woman filed a Jane Doe
lawsuit alleging the Trump had raped her
in in Jeffery Epstein's townhouse in New
York she would throw this withdrew the
suit her lawyer says she would threw the
suit because after she filed it
she got death threats I don't know
anything about the facts around that
other than that but I do think that as
you say there there isn't just it's not
just hearsay with Trump there's a lot of
examples of him walking up to a boundary
there's yet to be examples of him
crossing it in the way that I've seen
did Kareem why isn't this a more salient
political anchor around his neck why and
I remember when Hillary Clinton made an
issue out of some of these accusations
she I think aligned herself with Miss
Machado who Donald Trump had called Miss
Piggy and at but it's all the same
bucket of abusive denigrating derogatory
and then these accusations far more
serious criminal conduct around women
it's it's a it's a good question because
I think what has happen is as we all say
nothing everything we see is not normal
right none of this is normal but what
Donald Trump has managed to do is make
it normal it's it's the most bizarre
kind of backward things that we're
seeing like just what you were
describing I was thinking about what you
were saying about Epstein and Donald
Trump those are things that you hear in
a movie those rape that end the
political career of anyone before Donald
it's so true and but you you hear about
it in the movie but it's playing out in
the White House right in front of us
right we still we see Donald Trump
essentially doing the perp walk walking
with Alex Acosta and giving this
30-minute press conference first of all
Alex Acosta should have never had the
job in the first place and let's not
forget who was supposed to have that job
it was the labor secretary that he
really wanted was was accused of beating
his wife like these are the type of
people that he's bringing into the White
House into his administration so what is
not normal becomes in this weird way
normal because we're talking about all
of these awful things week after week
after week next week it'll be something
else
I should Parker I started and maybe this
is over sharing I've started to wonder
in this sort of vein of normalizing
Donald Trump's conduct if those of us
that talk about it and cover it or part
of the problem do you ever sit down and
type a lead and say I can't believe I
just wrote that I mean I wrote that line
you know a president a pedophile and a
prosecutor I thought what where am I
well I will say there's there's
something we've started doing at the
post which is recognizing that stuff
happens that in any other administration
would end a career or dominate a news
cycle and it sort of takes up you know
three hours or six hours because
something else
pushes it from the headlines and and we
are aware of that so we sometimes try to
go back and take an issue that may have
moved out of the news cycle but is still
really important and give it the second
look that it deserves an example was we
sort of took some time and went back and
really recreated what happened in
president Trump's response to
Charlottesville we've done that on some
other issues but as a journalist there
sort of is I think an industry-wide
recognition that a lot of these issues
don't necessarily get the time they
deserve because there's just such a
cascade and firehose of news in terms of
what you were saying but the headlines
were writing the leads were writing and
even the time we can devote to some of
this coverage well and I appreciate that
that we all kind of hit pause here and
let this sink in I want to let this sink
in for you and for Joyce this is Kamala
Harris on the Alex Acosta's defense of
the agreement that's not normal either
let's listen any prosecutor worth their
salt yeah especially one who who
understands the nature of these cases
which any prosecutor should if they're
taking the case on knows that this is
the exact kind of case yeah that is
typical somebody who's preyed on
children and that case should go before
a jury and that person should go to
prison for a long period of time
you know the thing that that I found
obviously you can tell by the tone of my
my perspective the thing that I found so
troubling disheartening and really
unbelievable was the way that Acosta has
described the challenge he had because
it's like saying it's really difficult
to make an omelet well then it get out
the kitchen if you don't know how to
cook actually this is something I've
heard from the right and the left in the
legal community this week any thoughts
on on sort of how Acosta's I know the
performance was viewed as passable from
the president's perspective and the
White House but the legal arguments are
not holding up with the test of time
well there was a sense again in the
White House that he sort of initially he
made a somewhat forceful case for why he
made that decision at the time but in
talking to people as the week progressed
there was also a sense especially when
we heard from the state prosecutor of
the state attorney general I believe
sort of saying this is absolutely false
and when does a federal Attorney General
defer to the state he had a 53 page
indictment he absolutely could have gone
forward if he had wanted to I think that
has become increasingly the prevailing
sentiment even if in the hours after his
news conference there was a sense that
he sort of quote-unquote won by doing
himself no harm and and one final point
is that again sure the performative
aspect in the White House is everything
there were some people who did want to
see him be more animated and then I was
talking to someone today who said they
wanted to see him sort of show more
compassion not just an animated defense
of himself that the president might have
wanted to see but these were these were
with young women these were children
they were raped they were abused and it
might have been at the very least
regardless of if it would have saved his
career not an appropriate moment to sort
of speak to them and show some empathy
and compassion
Joyce Ashley referenced that 53 page
indictment here's the Miami Herald
description of that lest we let the
facts of this get too far from our
conversations facing a 53 page federal
indictment Epstein could have ended up
in federal prison for the rest of his
life but a deal was struck an
extraordinary
plea agreement that would conceal the
full extent of Epstein's crimes and the
number of people involved that one
sentence that one paragraph two
sentences seems at the moment to be the
sum total of Alex Acosta's legacy at the
time that a costume made this decision
DOJ guidelines for prosecutors required
us to charge the most serious readily
provable offense in a case so for Acosta
to abandon this indictment that he had
prepared that was supported by evidence
with victims who were willing to come
forward is inexplicable and in hindsight
now all of these years later for him to
stand up and defend that decision is
really inexplicable to you on this same
timeline I had a case in my office I was
our appellate chief it was a case
involving making pornography with with
young victims and the prosecutor at
sentencing that the sentence that she
received was not the maximum sentence it
was long enough though to keep that
defendant in jail functionally for the
rest of his life and she was outraged
she wanted to appeal the judge she
wanted every last minute every last day
she was entitled to of this sentence
that's how strongly prosecutors feel
about these cases and about protecting
young children I don't understand the
Costas point of view here I want to ask
you about the role of money I mean we
talked a lot about you know miscarriage
of justice for women Acosta trotted out
this ludicrous argument about things
were so different it wasn't you know
1907 it was it was 2008 you know I but
money seems to be the variable not a
point in time so much of what Acosta
said in his weak defense simply doesn't
ring true for one of the most disturbing
portions of my FBI career I supervised
two crimes against children squad in
Northern California and I have to tell
you it still impacts me today and I can
tell you this no US attorney no
assistant US attorney ever said to me
I'm feeling a lot of pressure from this
defense team I really think the money
there
thrown around on this is going to hurt
us we've got to kind of deal it does not
happen when you're talking about
exploiting children does it happen in
white-collar crime big-time corporate
defense I've been involved in
indictments and convictions in cases in
fortune 100 corporations and yes they
have incredibly powerful attorneys and
yes there's a lot of money thrown around
but to hear Acosta equate that kind of
environment to a case where women young
girls are being exploited sexually it
simply doesn't happen something's wrong
with this picture and I continue to say
that's why we see public corruption
prosecutors involved in this s dny case
you know also due to what Frank was
saying about how you know the pressure
is not going to step up on Acosta in
Florida there's another piece of this in
New York with I think you know and the
other shoe to drop which were what kind
of records does did Jeffrey Epstein have
in his vaults and are there films or
photographs and Ashley's paper has a
David farad ball I believe reported that
in an address book he had 12 entries for
the trump's donald try was originally
Gawker or jigna had that that's been out
there for years but I think that you're
right with a meticulous note take a
meticulous note-taker he had cameras and
security in all of his homes the issue
of whether or not he was black by
blackmailing people who funded his money
management firm his quote money
management firms I don't think he was
actually managing money the issue that
arises there's Trump had an alliance
with David pecker Trump routinely
threatened journalists with tape
recordings I would go and meet with him
you don't mind if I I tape this and when
we litigated with them under in a
deposition we said you don't really have
a tape taping system to Union said no
but he would tell people in New York you
would tell business competitors that
they should watch out what they were do
what they were doing because he could go
to David pecker or the Today Show or
page six on the New York Post and
embarrass them and I think that one of
them when Trump is standing on the White
House lawn and saying that there's no
proof that he had a close relation with
Jeffrey Epstein there is going to be the
Southern District of New York which has
already looked at peckers relationship
with Trump land and stormy Daniels
looking at the same thing with Trump
and Epstein and video recordings and
there could there could be I don't know
that there is but I think there is a
possibility that it could be a very
visible record of their relationship
more questions than answers hey there
I'm Chris Hayes from MSNBC thanks for
watching MSNBC on YouTube if you want to
keep up to date with the videos we're
putting out you can click Subscribe just
below me or click over on this list to
see lots of other great videos