PLACED THERE AND IT’S ABOUT THE
PRESENT IN WHICH WE INTERPRET.
>> AND, DAVID, YOU SUGGESTED
THAT THE EMANCIPATION STATUE
WITH ABRAHAM LINCOLN SHOULD NOT
BE TORN DOWN.
EXPLAIN.
>> WELL, THAT MONUMENT WAS PUT
UP IN APRIL OF 1879, ON THE 11th
ANNIVERSARY OF LINCOLN’S
ASSASSINATION.
IT WAS PAID FOR, $20,000 BY
AFRICAN-AMERICANS.
THE FIRST $5 GIVEN BY A FORMER
SLAVE WOMAN NAMED CHARLOTTE
SCOTT IN MISSOURI.
THE MODEL FOR THE KNEELING
SLAVE, THE OFFENSIVE, NOW QUITE
OFFENSIVE IMAGE OF THAT KNEELING
SLAVE WAS A REAL PERSON NAMED
ARCHER ALEXANDER, WHO WAS THE
LAST PERSON IN MISSOURI ACTUALLY
PROSECUTED UNDER THE FUGITIVE
SLAVE ACT.
HE HAS A VERY INTERESTING
HISTORY HIMSELF.
THE WHOLE UNVEILING OF ANY THAT
STATUE WAS A BLACK AFFAIR IN
WASHINGTON, D.C.
A HUGE PARADE.
MOST IMPORTANTLY TO ME,
FREDERICK DOUGLASS ALL BUT MADE
THAT GROUND SACRED AT THE
UNVEILING SPEECH.
THAT SPEECH IS THE SECOND
GREATEST SPEECH OF DOUGLASS’S
LIFE AFTER HIS FOURTH OF JULY
SPEECH, BECAUSE IN THAT SPEECH
HE HONESTLY, FORTHRIGHTLY
DECLARED THAT ABRAHAM LINCOLN
HAD BEEN THE WHITE MAN’S
PRESIDENT.
THAT ABRAHAM LINCOLN HAD THE
ASSUMPTIONS AND PREJUDICES OF
WHITE AMERICANS.
HE DIDN’T JUST GET UP AND MAKE
SOME CEREMONIAL SPEECH.
HE BLUNTLY STATED THAT.
HE SAID, MY FELLOW WHITE
AMERICANS, YOU ARE ABRAHAM
LINCOLN’S CHILDREN.
I AND MY PEOPLE ARE ONLY HIS
STEP CHILDREN BY ADOPTION, BY
NECESSITY, BY CIRCUMSTANCES.
IN THE SECOND PART OF THE
SPEECH, CLASSIC MOVE BY DOUGLASS
IN HIS ORATORY, HE SHIFTED AND
HE SAID, UNDER HIS RULE AND
UNDUE TIME, HE USED IT THREE
TIMES AS A REFRAIN, HE SAID THE
WAY WE BECAME FREE WAS BY THIS
CAUTIOUS, METHODICAL METHOD THAT
LINCOLN USE FEDERAL POWER AND
USE THE ARMIES TO FREE
AFRICAN-AMERICANS.
SO, ON THE ONE HAND, IT WAS THIS
BLUNTLY HONEST STATEMENT OF
WHERE LINCOLN HAD COME FROM BUT
THEN ALSO ABOUT WHERE LINCOLN
HAD REACHED.
THE LAST POINT IN THAT SPEECH,
DOUGLASS WAS TELLING THE
COUNTRY, YOU’RE LOSING
RECONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW IN 1876
IF YOU DON’T ACT FAST, YOU WILL
LOSE ALL THE GREAT RESULTS OF
THE CIVIL WAR.
I PREFER THAT WE BUILD A NEW
EMANCIPATION MEMORIAL NEXT TO
THAT MONUMENT.
LET’S GET SOME MODERN ARTISTS
INSPIRED BY THIS STORY.
LET’S BUILD AN EMANCIPATION
MEMORIAL NEXT TO IT, WHICH IS
ACTUALLY WHAT FREDERICK DOUGLASS
ADVOCATED FIVE DAYS AFTER THAT
SPEECH.
>> I, IN FACT, HAVE THAT SPEECH
PINNED ON MY TWITTER FEED
BECAUSE IT LINES UP -- IF YOU
READ CARL SANDBERG’S BIOGRAPHY
OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN, HE WAS
CONSIDERED MADDENINGLY CAUTIOUS
BY ABOLITIONISTS.
HE WAS CONSIDERED MADDENINGLY
PRAGMATIC.
IN FACT, LINCOLN SAID AT THE
BEGINNING, WROTE A LETTER TO THE
NATION SAYING IF MY GOAL IS TO
SAVE THE UNION, IF THAT MEANS
IT’S A UNION THAT’S HALF FREE,
HALF SLAVE, THAT IS MY GOAL.
IF THAT MEANS, IT IS COMPLETELY
FREE, THAT IS MY GOAL.
I PUT SAVING THE UNION ABOVE
ANYTHING ELSE.
AS YOU READ SANDBERG’ BOOK, YOU
UNDERSTAND THAT LINCOLN IS JUST
TRYING TO DRAG, NOT THE SOUTH,
HE’S FIGHTING THE SOUTH, THE
NORTH ALONG IN THIS PROJECT TO
FREE THE SLAVES AND THAT
DOUGLASS SPEECH, EXCUSE ME FOR
GOING ON HERE, IT IS ONE OF THE
MOST REMARKABLE SPEECHES I’VE
EVER HEARD IN EXPLAINING ABRAHAM
LINCOLN AND THE MISSION OF
ABRAHAM LINCOLN.
KIMBERLY, DONALD TRUMP WOULD
LIKE US TO BELIEVE IF WILSON’S NAME IS TAKEN OFF OF PRINCETON
NAME IS TAKEN OFF OF PRINCETON
OR IF A FOUNDER OF THE KLU KLUX
KLAN STATUE IS TAKEN DOWN,
THEY’RE COMING AFTER THE
WASHINGTON MEMORIAL NEXT.
WHAT SHOULD THE RESPONSE TO THAT
BE?
>> THE MESSAGING BY THE
PRESIDENT IS SERVING A SPECIFIC
PURPOSE.
IT’S A CALL TO THE SPECIFIC PART
OF AMERICA THAT HE BELIEVES IS
IMPORTANT TO HIM, THAT HE
BELIEVES HE NEEDS TO GALVANIZE
IN ORDER TO WIN POLITICALLY.
THE PRESIDENT IS NOT SPEAKING AS
AN HISTORIAN.
HE’S NOT SPEAKING ABOUT THE
VALUES OF AMERICA AS AN
INSTITUTION.
HE’S SPEAKING ABOUT -- HE’S
SPEAKING TO THE PEOPLE IMPORTANT
TO HIM IN THAT SENSE.
I THINK THAT’S A VERY DIFFERENT
DISCUSSION THAN THE ONE THAT WE
ARE HAVING HERE.
I CAN SPEAK FOR MYSELF AS A
BLACK AMERICAN KNOWING MANY OF
THESE MONUMENTS WERE PUT UP FOR
THE PURPOSE OF TERRORISM, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF TERRORIZING BLACK
AMERICANS LONG AFTER THE CIVIL
WAR WAS DONE SPEAKS VOLUMES
ABOUT WHAT THEY ENSHRINE AND
WHAT THEY MEAN.
BUT I WOULD LOVE TO ASK EDDIE A
QUESTION.
AS WE STAND NOW IN WHAT AT SOME
POINT WILL BE CALLED THE CIVIL
RIGHTS ERA OF THE 2020s AND HOW
THAT WILL BE MEMORIALIZED.
HOW SHOULD AMERICA THINK OF THAT
MOVING FORWARD?
HOW DO WE MEMORIALIZE THIS
MOMENT WHAT MONUMENTS SHOULD BE
MADE TO THIS MOMENT AND HOW DO
YOU DEAL WITH THE FA ACCOUNT
THAT WE LIVE IN A COUNTRY WHERE
OUR PRESIDENTS -- WHERE
MONUMENTS WERE MADE TO OUR
PRESIDENT?
SO WHAT WILL A MONUMENT TO THE
45th PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
STATES LOOK LIKE, WHAT SHOULD IT
LOOK LIKE?
>> I’M NOT SURE, KIMBERLY, TO BE
HONEST WITH YOU.
AS DAVID BLIGHT, THE HISTORIAN,
WOULD SAY, WE HAVE TO WAIT AND
SEE.
HE HAS A CHOICE.
IT IS A MOMENTOUS CHOICE.
WHETHER OR NOT WE’RE GOING TO
DOUBLE DOWN ON OUR UGLINESS OR
IMAGINE A NEW AMERICA.
I WAS JUST THINKING ABOUT THAT
SPEECH BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS,
AND KIMBERLY AND JOE AND DAVID
AND WILLIE AND MIKA, I WAS
THINKING ABOUT THAT SPEECH AND
DRAWING A STRAIGHT LINE TO JIMMY
BALDWIN.
THERE’S A LINE THAT JIMMY USES
WHERE HE SAYS, PEOPLE THAT
IMAGINE HISTORY FLATTERS THEM
ARE IMPALED ON THEIR HISTORY
LIKE A BUTTERFLY ON A PIN.
WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE
UGLINESS OF WHO WE ARE AND WHAT
WE’VE DONE IN ORDER TO IMAGINE
OURSELVES OTHERWISE.
THAT’S WHAT IT MEANS TO BE
CREATURES OF HISTORY.
THAT’S WHAT IT MEANS TO CARRY
HISTORY FORWARD INTO THE PRESENT
AND AS WE TRY DESPERATELY TO
IMAGINE A BETTER FUTURE.
>> EDDIE, WELL SAID.
I WAS GOING TO ASK YOU TO BRING
MR. BALDWIN BACK INTO THE
CONVERSATION AROUND YOUR BOOK
HERE AND SPEAK SPECIFICALLY
ABOUT THE MONUMENT QUESTION, YOU
STARTED TO DO IT RIGHT THERE.
YOU KNOW, HE WAS INSISTENT THAT
WHITE AMERICANS HAVE TOLD
THEMSELVES A VERSION OF HISTORY
THAT PUTS THEM AT THE CENTER OF
IT, OF COURSE.
AND AS YOU QUOTED THERE,
FLATTERS THEM.
WHAT DOES TAKING DOWN A
CONFEDERATE STATUE, WHAT DOES
CHALLENGING SOME OF THE STORIES
OF HISTORY WE’VE HEARD, WHAT
DOES THAT DO FOR OUR NEW LOOK AT
HISTORY, THE WAY, PERHAPS, JAMES
BALDWIN WOULD WANT US TO LOOK AT
IT?
>> I THINK THE FIRST THING,
WILLIE -- THAT’S SUCH A GREAT
QUESTION.
THE FIRST THING IT IS, IT IS AN
EXPLICIT ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS THE
LIE.
THE LOST CAUSE IS A LIE.
THE STATUES ARE MEMORIALS TO
THAT LIE.
OUTSIDE OF THE FACT THAT IT
ACTUALLY HAPPENED IN HISTORY,
BUT THE STORY IT TRIES TO
COMMEND, THE VALUES THOSE
STATUES REPRESENT ARE VALUES
THAT RUN CONTRARY TO A ROBUST
UNDERSTANDING OR ROBUST VIEW OF
MULTIRACIAL DEMOCRACY.
SO WHAT BALDWIN CONSTANTLY ASKED
OF US AND WHAT I’M ASKING OF US
IN THIS MOMENT IS THAT WE
CONFRONT OR HISTORY, WE CONFRONT
THE STORIES WE’VE TOLD OF
OURSELVES, SO THAT WE CAN
ACTUALLY FREE OURSELVES INTO
IMAGINING AMERICA DIFFERENTLY
AND TO IMAGINE OUR RELATIONSHIP
TO EACH OTHER DIFFERENTLY.
AND I THINK THAT’S WHAT BALDWIN
MEANT WHEN HE SAID THE GREAT
FORCE OF HISTORY IS THAT WE
CARRY IT FORWARD IN OURSELVES
AND IT’S WITH GREAT PAIN AND
TERROR THAT WE CONFRONT
OURSELVES WHICH MEANS WE
CONFRONT THAT HISTORY.
SO, I UNDERSTAND WHAT ROSS IS
TALKING ABOUT, WHAT HE’S WRITING
ABOUT.
I UNDERSTAND THE ANXIETY THAT
SOME FOLK ARE HAVING AS WE
STRUGGLE WITH THE MEANING OF
JEFFERSON AND WASHINGTON AND THE
MEANING OF THESE MONUMENTS, BUT
I DO KNOW BE THIS, THAT IF WE
DON’T STRUGGLE, WE WILL BE
PERMANENTLY DOCKED AT THE
STATION.
WE WILL NOT CHANGE.
AND THEN THE MONUMENTS THAT KIM
ASKED ABOUT WILL BE MONUMENTS TO
RUINS, NOT TO A BETTER AMERICA.
>> MIKE BARNICLE HAS A QUESTION
FOR DAVID.
MIKE?
>> DAVID, LISTENING TO THIS
CONVERSATION THIS MORNING, THIS
IS WHAT WE DO BEST.
NOT JUST ON THIS SHOW, BUT
TELEVISION.
THIS IS WHAT WE DO BEST.
WE DON’T DO IT OFTEN ENOUGH BUT
IT IS REALLY REWARDING AND
ENRICHING TO LISTEN TO WHAT’S
BEEN GOING ON HERE FOR THE PAST
SEVERAL MINUTES.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS, HISTORY
WAS MY FAVORITE COURSE IN HIGH
SCHOOL.
I LOVED HISTORY.
I STILL LOVE HISTORY.
BUT HISTORY IS LITERALLY A STUDY
OF THE PAST.
AS WE DISCUSS WHAT WE’RE
DISCUSSING TODAY WITH ALL THESE
KERNELS OF INFORMATION DROPPED
OUT THAT MANY PEOPLE HAVE NOT
HEARD OF BEFORE, IS IT NOT AN
INDICTMENT OF THE WAY WE HAVE
BEEN TEACHING HISTORY TO OUR
CHILDREN, THE OMISSION OF ALL OF
THESE VITAL FACTS ABOUT WHO WE
REALLY ARE TODAY?
>> WELL, MIKE, THANK YOU FOR
THAT QUESTION.
I’M AFRAID THE ANSWER IS YES AND
NO.
HISTORIANS FOR THREE GENERATIONS
HAVE REWRITTEN THE HISTORY OF
THIS COUNTRY, ESPECIALLY THE
HISTORY OF SLAVERY, RACE, THE
CIVIL WAR, RECONSTRUCTION, JIM
CROW ERA, CIVIL RIGHTS, BUT
THERE IS ALWAYS A GREAT DISTANCE
BETWEEN THE SCHOLARLY HISTORY WE
WRITE IN THE ACADEMY, EVEN THOSE
WHO WRITE FOR LARGER AUDIENCES,
AND THE PUBLIC MEMORY.
THE TASK IS TO AFFECT THAT
PUBLIC MEMORY.
AND I WOULD HAVE -- BY THE WAY,
A SHOUT OUT TO EDDIE’S BOOK.
GET THE BOOK, FOLKS.
TAKE A WALK WITH EDDIE, WITH
JAMES BALDWIN.
IT WILL BE REWARDING.
NOW, LAST POINT, I LOVE THE FACT
THAT YOU ALL USE THOSE CLIPS OF
VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN’S SPEECH
YESTERDAY BECAUSE ONE OF THE
BEST THINGS THE BIDEN CAMPAIGN
COULD DO RIGHT NOW, I THINK IT
WOULD BE VERY POPULAR, IS TO
ANNOUNCE THEY’RE GOING TO GET
BEHIND THIS.
NOT JUST TAKING DOWN CONFEDERATE
MONUMENTS AND HAVING TO, YOU
KNOW, CUT THAT FINE LINE BETWEEN
WHICH SLAVEHOLDER WE TAKE AWAY
AND WHICH SLAVEHOLDER WE DON’T,
BUT WHY NOT GET BEHIND
GET BEHIND THE ISSUE OR THE IDEA
OF BUILDING CONFEDERATION
MEMORIALS.
LET’S REPLACE IT WITH SERIOUS,
INTERESTING, HISTORICALLY
INFORMEDINFORM
ED EMANCIPATION MEMORIALS?
START WITH ONE IN LINCOLN PARK
IN WASHINGTON, AND HAVE A
COMMISSION THAT ALLOWS
LOCALITIES TO DO THE SAME, EVERY
PLACE THAT HAD A REFUGEE CAMP
FOR ESCAPED SLAVES AND LET’S
MOVE ON TO WHAT WAS JUST
SUGGESTED ABOUT THIS MOMENT.
HOW WILL WE BEGIN TO THINK ABOUT
COMMEMORATING THIS MOMENT?
WE NEED A LOT MORE TIME TO DO
THAT.
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION SHOULD
GET BEHIND THAT.
I’M SORRY --
>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS
MORNING.
WE WILL CONTINUE OUR