Practice English Speaking&Listening with: House votes to remove deadline to ratify 1972 Equal Rights Amendment

LOOK

LOOK FOR

LOOK FOR THOSE

LOOK FOR THOSE ON

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >>

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY

LOOK FOR THOSE ON AIR AND AT THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >>

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >>

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9

THREATEBN NEWSNOW DOT >> COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR

COM THEY'VE ONLY >> BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972

BEEN TRYING FOR FORTY 9 YEARS TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2

TODAY THERE WAS A MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE.

FORWARD FOR THE 1972 EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE

RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE

RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE

RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD

RIGHTS AMENDMENT ON A 2 HUNDRED AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION.

AND TWENTY 2 TO 204 VOTE. THE HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE

HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE

HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE

HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD

HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE

HOUSE WOULD REPRESENTATIVES APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE

APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE

APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL

APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN

APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY

APPROVED A KEY RESOLUTION. THE MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO

MEASURE WOULD REMOVE THE ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA.

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE

ORIGINAL NINETEEN SEVENTY 9 DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS

DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS

DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY

DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED

DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO

DEADLINE FOR STATES TO RATIFY THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982.

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982.

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY

THE ERA. THAT DEADLINE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE

SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE

SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT

SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS

SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY

SUBSEQUENTLY EXTENDED TO 1982. SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED

SUPPORTERS OF THE NRA SAY THE AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD

AMENDMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE

RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE

RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED

RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS

RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE

RATIFIED BY THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE

OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE

OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY

OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH

OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT

OF STATES AND SHOULD BE PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >>

PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >>

PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND

PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE

PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST

PUBLISHED AS THE CONSTITUTE TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY

TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY

TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF

TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS

TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT

TWENTY EIGHTH AMENDMENT >> AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR

AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL

OF AMERICANS SUPPORT CONGRESS SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT.

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT.

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT

SET A DEADLINE FOR RATIFICATION WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION DATE

WHICH MEANS WE CAN REPEAL IT. IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON

IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON

IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY

IT'S TIME TO AFFIRM THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >>

IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >>

IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >> .BUT

IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS

IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY

IS NO EXPIRATION DATE ON EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS

EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS

EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT

EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY

EQUALITY >> .BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES

.BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES

.BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED

.BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED DEADLINE

.BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED DEADLINE DECADES

.BUT OPPONENTS SAY CONGRESS CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED DEADLINE DECADES AFTER

CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED DEADLINE DECADES AFTER

CANNOT RETROACTIVELY CHANGES IMPOSED DEADLINE DECADES AFTER IT