To formulate reference charts and equations for estimated fetal weight (EFW) from a large sample of fetuses and to compare these charts and equations with those obtained for birth weight during the same study period and in the same single health authority.

Methods

Biometric data were obtained at 20–36 weeks’ gestation from routine screening examinations spanning 4 years. Exclusion criteria were a known abnormal karyotype or congenital malformation and multiple pregnancy. No data were excluded on the basis of abnormal biometry. EFW was calculated based on Hadlock’s formula. We used a polynomial regression approach (mean and SD model) to compute a new reference chart for EFW. This chart was compared with that of birth weight at 25–36 weeks’ gestation during the same study period and in the same health authority.

Results

18 959 fetuses were included in the study. New charts and equations for Z‐score calculations at 20–36 weeks’ gestation are reported. Comparison with the birth‐weight chart showed that the EFW was noticeably larger at 25–36 weeks’ gestation. At 28–32 weeks’ gestation, the 50^th centile for birth weight compared approximately with the 10^th centile for EFW.

Conclusion

We present new reference charts and equations for EFW. EFW is computed throughout gestation based on measurements in healthy fetuses. However, before full term, birth‐weight charts reflect a significant proportion of growth‐restricted fetuses that deliver prematurely. We provide additional evidence that comparing EFW with birth‐weight charts is misleading. Copyright © 2007 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.